Evolutionary medicine perspective on coping style and health outcomes: an exploratory study.

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology Pub Date : 2019-11-29 DOI:10.1127/homo/2019/1094
Ivana Hromatko, M. Tadinac, N. Jokić-begić, Anita Lauri-Korajlija, L. Kotrulja
{"title":"Evolutionary medicine perspective on coping style and health outcomes: an exploratory study.","authors":"Ivana Hromatko, M. Tadinac, N. Jokić-begić, Anita Lauri-Korajlija, L. Kotrulja","doi":"10.1127/homo/2019/1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the issues within the framework of Darwinian medicine is why individuals develop the specific disease they do. Ethologists have long known that within any given population, there are organisms with the tendency towards higher (Hawks) or lower (Doves) aggressiveness, and since the physiological responses to stressful events are different in Hawks and Doves, it has been suggested that these strategies might be related to health outcomes. The aims of this exploratory study were to determine whether an analogues of Hawks and Doves as basic coping strategies could be defined among chronically ill patients and healthy controls and whether the proportion of Hawks and Doves differs among different groups of patients. Patients from several clinical departments (dermatology, gastroenterology and psychiatry) and a comparable group of healthy participants were recruited (N = 288). Based on their coping style and anxiety trait, they were categorized as either Hawks (low anxiety trait and problem-oriented coping style) or Doves (high anxiety trait and avoidant coping style). We found a significantly larger proportion of Hawks among patients with gastroenterological and dermatologic symptoms, and significantly more Doves among psychiatric patients. The proportion of Hawks and Doves in healthy controls was close to 50:50. This is in accordance with the notion that Hawks and Doves have different allostatic load management, and that the onset of certain diseases might be related to these strategies. However, prospective longitudinal studies are necessary to reach definite conclusions regarding the susceptibility to certain diseases among people with different stress-related behavioral and emotional strategies.","PeriodicalId":46714,"journal":{"name":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/homo/2019/1094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the issues within the framework of Darwinian medicine is why individuals develop the specific disease they do. Ethologists have long known that within any given population, there are organisms with the tendency towards higher (Hawks) or lower (Doves) aggressiveness, and since the physiological responses to stressful events are different in Hawks and Doves, it has been suggested that these strategies might be related to health outcomes. The aims of this exploratory study were to determine whether an analogues of Hawks and Doves as basic coping strategies could be defined among chronically ill patients and healthy controls and whether the proportion of Hawks and Doves differs among different groups of patients. Patients from several clinical departments (dermatology, gastroenterology and psychiatry) and a comparable group of healthy participants were recruited (N = 288). Based on their coping style and anxiety trait, they were categorized as either Hawks (low anxiety trait and problem-oriented coping style) or Doves (high anxiety trait and avoidant coping style). We found a significantly larger proportion of Hawks among patients with gastroenterological and dermatologic symptoms, and significantly more Doves among psychiatric patients. The proportion of Hawks and Doves in healthy controls was close to 50:50. This is in accordance with the notion that Hawks and Doves have different allostatic load management, and that the onset of certain diseases might be related to these strategies. However, prospective longitudinal studies are necessary to reach definite conclusions regarding the susceptibility to certain diseases among people with different stress-related behavioral and emotional strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进化医学视角下应对方式与健康结果的探索性研究。
达尔文医学框架内的一个问题是为什么个体会患上特定的疾病。动物行为学家早就知道,在任何给定的种群中,都有倾向于更高(鹰)或更低(鸽)攻击性的生物,并且由于鹰和鸽对压力事件的生理反应不同,因此有人认为这些策略可能与健康结果有关。本探索性研究的目的是确定在慢性疾病患者和健康对照组中是否可以定义鹰和鸽的类似物作为基本应对策略,以及不同患者群体中鹰和鸽的比例是否存在差异。来自多个临床科室(皮肤科、胃肠科和精神科)的患者和一组可比较的健康参与者被招募(N = 288)。根据他们的应对方式和焦虑特征,他们被分为鹰派(低焦虑特征和问题导向的应对方式)和鸽派(高焦虑特征和回避型的应对方式)。我们发现,有胃肠病学和皮肤病症状的患者中,鹰型患者的比例显著增加,而在精神病学患者中,鸽型患者的比例显著增加。在健康对照中,鹰派和鸽派的比例接近50:50。这与鹰和鸽有不同的适应负荷管理的概念是一致的,某些疾病的发作可能与这些策略有关。然而,对于具有不同压力相关行为和情绪策略的人群对某些疾病的易感性,需要前瞻性的纵向研究来得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Flat feet occurrence among young school-age children and its association with body mass index values. Revisiting the age of the Florisbad hominin material. Reproductive behaviour and longevity: Evidence from Chinese centenarians. Statistical classification methods for estimating sex based on five skull traits: A nonmetric assessment using 3D CT models. Sex- and site-specific, age-related changes in bone density - a Terry collection study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1