Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Ethical Issues Relating to the Use of Autonomous Armed Drones in Promotional Videos

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of War & Culture Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1080/17526272.2022.2119662
Peter Burt
{"title":"Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Ethical Issues Relating to the Use of Autonomous Armed Drones in Promotional Videos","authors":"Peter Burt","doi":"10.1080/17526272.2022.2119662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers how autonomous drone systems are portrayed in three promotional videos published by military-industrial advocates of such technology. The videos are reviewed to explore ethical issues relating to armed drones and autonomous systems in warfare. The manner in which each video depicts technology, humans, and human-machine interactions is analysed in the context of sociotechnical imaginaries to examine how the videos reflect attitudes relating to the ethics of automation and warfare. It is concluded that the videos present uncertainties and ambiguities about autonomous weapons as certainties and simple choices. Issues which are not covered may be as important as the material and imagery presented. Rather than adding to public understanding over the issues surrounding autonomous weapons, concerns are presented in a selective and sanitised manner which avoids controversy and ultimately manipulates the opinions of the viewer, contributing to the creation of a sociotechnical imaginary which downplays ethical concerns.","PeriodicalId":42946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of War & Culture Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of War & Culture Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2022.2119662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers how autonomous drone systems are portrayed in three promotional videos published by military-industrial advocates of such technology. The videos are reviewed to explore ethical issues relating to armed drones and autonomous systems in warfare. The manner in which each video depicts technology, humans, and human-machine interactions is analysed in the context of sociotechnical imaginaries to examine how the videos reflect attitudes relating to the ethics of automation and warfare. It is concluded that the videos present uncertainties and ambiguities about autonomous weapons as certainties and simple choices. Issues which are not covered may be as important as the material and imagery presented. Rather than adding to public understanding over the issues surrounding autonomous weapons, concerns are presented in a selective and sanitised manner which avoids controversy and ultimately manipulates the opinions of the viewer, contributing to the creation of a sociotechnical imaginary which downplays ethical concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼不见,心不烦?与在宣传视频中使用自主武装无人机有关的伦理问题
本文考虑了自主无人机系统是如何在这种技术的军事工业倡导者发布的三个宣传视频中被描绘出来的。对这些视频进行审查,以探讨与战争中武装无人机和自主系统有关的伦理问题。在社会技术想象的背景下,分析每个视频描述技术,人类和人机交互的方式,以检查视频如何反映与自动化和战争伦理有关的态度。结论是,视频显示了自主武器作为确定性和简单选择的不确定性和模糊性。未涉及的问题可能与所提供的材料和图像一样重要。而不是增加公众对围绕自主武器的问题的理解,关注以一种选择性和净化的方式呈现,避免了争议,最终操纵了观众的观点,有助于创造一种社会技术想象,淡化了道德问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Unfashionable Revenge in Stanley Kubrick’s Aryan Papers Placing the Location Outtakes of Shoah Introduction: Unmade Holocaust Film Shadow Quality TV: HBO’s Complicity and the Failure to Portray Allied Indifference to the Holocaust, 1995–2003 Stanley Kubrick's Quest for the Heroic: Turning Wartime Lies into Aryan Papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1