Mixed implications of private supplementary tutoring for students’ learning

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2019-02-11 DOI:10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0008
R. Mahmud
{"title":"Mixed implications of private supplementary tutoring for students’ learning","authors":"R. Mahmud","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePrivate supplementary tutoring, common in many countries, has mixed (both positive and negative) dimensions that impact student learning. Private supplementary tutoring runs parallel to mainstream schooling and provides lessons before or after school hours in exchange for additional fees. The purpose of this paper is to focus on how private supplementary tutoring benefits students’ learning in secondary education. It also identifies the drawbacks of tutoring, and shows variations in and between urban and rural locations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employed a mixed methods approach using a survey and individual interview collected from two different research settings: urban and rural. Grades 8 and 10 were purposefully chosen for data collection. A sample of 802 participants, including 401 students and their 401 parents (either mothers or fathers), participated in the survey, in addition to 48 interviewees comprising students, parents and teachers.FindingsAt times, pupils’ educational perspectives are influenced by the conflicting (positive/negative) standpoints of tutoring issues. The paper finds mixed impacts of private tutoring with a focus on disparities of implications between urban and rural locations. It identifies positive aspects such as learning attainment, exam preparation, relationship growth and lesson practice, as well as negative perspectives, such as an examination-centered aim and hamper of mainstream school learning.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the awareness of private supplementary tutoring that benefits students’ learning while also bringing disadvantages. It shows implications of fee-charging tutoring which may relate to students’ family socio-economic situations. The paper addresses private tutoring in general (including English and all other subjects) in most cases, and, more specifically, private tutoring in English as a subject in some cases.","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

PurposePrivate supplementary tutoring, common in many countries, has mixed (both positive and negative) dimensions that impact student learning. Private supplementary tutoring runs parallel to mainstream schooling and provides lessons before or after school hours in exchange for additional fees. The purpose of this paper is to focus on how private supplementary tutoring benefits students’ learning in secondary education. It also identifies the drawbacks of tutoring, and shows variations in and between urban and rural locations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employed a mixed methods approach using a survey and individual interview collected from two different research settings: urban and rural. Grades 8 and 10 were purposefully chosen for data collection. A sample of 802 participants, including 401 students and their 401 parents (either mothers or fathers), participated in the survey, in addition to 48 interviewees comprising students, parents and teachers.FindingsAt times, pupils’ educational perspectives are influenced by the conflicting (positive/negative) standpoints of tutoring issues. The paper finds mixed impacts of private tutoring with a focus on disparities of implications between urban and rural locations. It identifies positive aspects such as learning attainment, exam preparation, relationship growth and lesson practice, as well as negative perspectives, such as an examination-centered aim and hamper of mainstream school learning.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the awareness of private supplementary tutoring that benefits students’ learning while also bringing disadvantages. It shows implications of fee-charging tutoring which may relate to students’ family socio-economic situations. The paper addresses private tutoring in general (including English and all other subjects) in most cases, and, more specifically, private tutoring in English as a subject in some cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人补习对学生学习的复杂影响
目的:私人补习在许多国家都很常见,对学生学习的影响既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面。私人补习与主流学校并行,在课前或课后提供课程,以换取额外的费用。本文的目的是关注私人补习如何在中学教育中有益于学生的学习。它还指出了家教的缺点,并显示了城市和农村地区之间的差异。设计/方法/方法本文采用混合方法,从城市和农村两个不同的研究环境中收集调查和个人访谈。有目的地选择8年级和10年级进行数据收集。802名参与者参与了调查,其中包括401名学生和他们的401名家长(母亲或父亲),此外还有48名受访者,包括学生、家长和老师。研究发现,在家教问题上,学生的教育观受到相互冲突的(积极/消极)观点的影响。本文发现私人辅导的混合影响,重点是城市和农村地区之间的影响差异。它确定了积极的方面,如学习成就、考试准备、关系发展和课程实践,以及消极的方面,如以考试为中心的目标和主流学校学习的阻碍。独创性/价值本研究有助于人们认识到私人补习对学生的学习有益,但也有缺点。研究表明,收费辅导可能与学生的家庭社会经济状况有关。在大多数情况下,本文讨论了一般的私人辅导(包括英语和所有其他科目),更具体地说,在某些情况下,以英语为主题的私人辅导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Educational aspirations of school adolescents in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: how are these aspirations shaped? Reasonable adjustment for inclusive development: a cautionary case study of Australian VET teachers’ experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1