{"title":"Just Add Global","authors":"Michaela Bronstein","doi":"10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What happens when a field is no longer the site of a shared political mission? This essay considers the simultaneous “global” turns in modernist studies and postcolonial studies, arguing that in each case a field defined by a set of central theoretical commitments and purposes was replaced by an understanding of a field as a hospitable location in which multiple competing projects might coexist. The essay suggests, using a reading of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o's Petals of Blood in the context of Russian literature, that our new field formations invite an understanding of solidarity as a fragile, contingent possibility: something that we can't merely detect in the present, but must look for in new and sometimes unforeseen forms.","PeriodicalId":19001,"journal":{"name":"Molecular interventions","volume":"23 1","pages":"679 - 693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2022.2161055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
What happens when a field is no longer the site of a shared political mission? This essay considers the simultaneous “global” turns in modernist studies and postcolonial studies, arguing that in each case a field defined by a set of central theoretical commitments and purposes was replaced by an understanding of a field as a hospitable location in which multiple competing projects might coexist. The essay suggests, using a reading of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o's Petals of Blood in the context of Russian literature, that our new field formations invite an understanding of solidarity as a fragile, contingent possibility: something that we can't merely detect in the present, but must look for in new and sometimes unforeseen forms.
当一个领域不再是共同政治使命的场所时会发生什么?本文考虑了现代主义研究和后殖民研究中同时出现的“全球”转向,认为在每种情况下,由一系列核心理论承诺和目的定义的领域都被一种对领域的理解所取代,即作为一个好客的场所,多个相互竞争的项目可能共存。这篇文章在俄罗斯文学的背景下,通过对Ngũgĩ wa Thiong 'o的《血的花瓣》的阅读,表明我们的新领域形成让我们理解团结是一种脆弱的、偶然的可能性:我们不能仅仅在当下发现它,而是必须在新的、有时是不可预见的形式中寻找它。