Variation in Growth Response of Coastal Dune-Building Grass Species Ammophila Arenaria and Leymus Arenarius to Sand Burial

IF 0.4 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES GAYANA BOTANICA Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2478/botlit-2020-0013
G. Ievinsh, Una Andersone-Ozola
{"title":"Variation in Growth Response of Coastal Dune-Building Grass Species Ammophila Arenaria and Leymus Arenarius to Sand Burial","authors":"G. Ievinsh, Una Andersone-Ozola","doi":"10.2478/botlit-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ammophila arenaria and Leymus arenarius are dune-building grass species native to European seacoasts. The present study aimed to compare growth responses to the sand burial of A. arenaria and L. arenarius from coastal habitats of the Baltic Sea, when the intensity of sand accretion was relatively low under controlled conditions. Plants were grown from seeds collected from natural coastal habitats, transplanted into individual containers, buried in the sand at different depths in the rapid shoot elongation stage, and further cultivated (11 or 9 weeks) in an automated greenhouse. Burial in sand significantly stimulated the growth of shoots of A. arenaria, the effect was earlier at high burial intensities (46 and 60%) and was evident ten days after the start of treatment. Both shoot and root dry mass increased for plants buried at 13%; however, increased burial depth (37, 46 and 60%) resulted in a significant increase in root biomass. In comparison, shoot biomass decreased significantly at the highest burial intensity (60%). For L. arenarius, there was no direct dependence of shoot elongation rate on burial depth. There was a tendency for increased elongation growth and biomass allocation to leaf sheaths despite a decrease in total shoot mass. Most strikingly, root biomass decreased with sand burial in parallel with increased burial depth up to 21% intensity. In conclusion, although both grass species showed a positive shoot growth response to moderate sand burial intensity, differences in individual responses at the morphological and physiological level indicate the existence of different genetically based adaptation strategies.","PeriodicalId":55127,"journal":{"name":"GAYANA BOTANICA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GAYANA BOTANICA","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/botlit-2020-0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Ammophila arenaria and Leymus arenarius are dune-building grass species native to European seacoasts. The present study aimed to compare growth responses to the sand burial of A. arenaria and L. arenarius from coastal habitats of the Baltic Sea, when the intensity of sand accretion was relatively low under controlled conditions. Plants were grown from seeds collected from natural coastal habitats, transplanted into individual containers, buried in the sand at different depths in the rapid shoot elongation stage, and further cultivated (11 or 9 weeks) in an automated greenhouse. Burial in sand significantly stimulated the growth of shoots of A. arenaria, the effect was earlier at high burial intensities (46 and 60%) and was evident ten days after the start of treatment. Both shoot and root dry mass increased for plants buried at 13%; however, increased burial depth (37, 46 and 60%) resulted in a significant increase in root biomass. In comparison, shoot biomass decreased significantly at the highest burial intensity (60%). For L. arenarius, there was no direct dependence of shoot elongation rate on burial depth. There was a tendency for increased elongation growth and biomass allocation to leaf sheaths despite a decrease in total shoot mass. Most strikingly, root biomass decreased with sand burial in parallel with increased burial depth up to 21% intensity. In conclusion, although both grass species showed a positive shoot growth response to moderate sand burial intensity, differences in individual responses at the morphological and physiological level indicate the existence of different genetically based adaptation strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海岸造沙草砂砂草和羊草对沙埋的生长响应变化
沙羊草和沙羊草是原产于欧洲海岸的造沙草。本研究的目的是比较波罗的海沿岸生境在沙积强度相对较低的条件下,砂藻和砂藻的生长对沙埋的响应。从自然海岸生境收集种子,移栽到单独的容器中,在快速芽伸长阶段埋在不同深度的沙子中,并在自动化温室中进一步培养(11或9周)。沙埋对沙棘芽的生长有显著的促进作用,且在高掩埋强度(46%和60%)时效果较早,在处理10 d后效果明显。埋埋13%的植株茎、根干质量均增加;然而,增加埋深(37、46和60%)导致根系生物量显著增加。在最高掩埋强度(60%)下,地上部生物量显著下降。砂砂草的芽伸长率与埋深无直接关系。尽管总梢质量减少,但伸长生长和生物量分配给叶鞘的趋势增加。最显著的是,随着埋砂深度的增加,根系生物量呈平行下降趋势,埋砂强度达到21%。综上所述,尽管两种禾草对中等埋沙强度均表现出积极的幼苗生长响应,但在形态和生理水平上的个体响应差异表明存在不同的遗传适应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GAYANA BOTANICA
GAYANA BOTANICA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes works carried out by scientists of all nationalities, and may be written in either English or Spanish. The journal receives works in systematic, taxonomy, floristic, ecology, physiology, morphology, development, conservation, cytology and phytochemical botany.
期刊最新文献
PROF. CLAUDIO DONOSO ZEGERS Q.E.P.D. (1933-2021) Humedales turbosos del Parque Nacional Nahuelbuta (Región de la Araucanía) comparados con otros, en un gradiente latitudinal de Chile Después de más de un siglo en el olvido resurge una especie en Dysopsis (Euphorbiaceae) La familia Gleicheniaceae (Polypodiopsida) en Argentina y Paraguay Effects of UV-B radiation on the morphology, UV-B absorbing compounds and photosynthetic pigment content of Plantago lanceolata and Rheum rhabarbarum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1