Trigeminal‐Targeted Treatments in Migraine: Is 60% the Magic Number?

P. Barbanti, G. Egeo, D. Mitsikostas
{"title":"Trigeminal‐Targeted Treatments in Migraine: Is 60% the Magic Number?","authors":"P. Barbanti, G. Egeo, D. Mitsikostas","doi":"10.1111/head.13635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trigeminal‐targeted treatments (TTTs), the most specific and selective therapeutic migraine approach to date, are effective in approximately 60% of patients regardless of treatment type or mechanism, at least if used alone. Sixty percent is also the proportion of migraineurs who develop migraine‐like episodes following experimental intravenous administration of trigeminal neuropeptides and roughly 60% is the percentage of patients with a unilateral migraine tracing the area of cutaneous distribution of the trigeminal ophthalmic branch. Hence, mechanisms other than the trigeminovascular activation are probably involved in the 40% of migraineurs who do not respond to TTTs. A closer cooperation between clinical and basic neuroscientists is needed to explore migraine models because only a careful appraisal of migraine endophenotypes may help to unravel their underlying multifaceted pathophysiological machinery.","PeriodicalId":12845,"journal":{"name":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Trigeminal‐targeted treatments (TTTs), the most specific and selective therapeutic migraine approach to date, are effective in approximately 60% of patients regardless of treatment type or mechanism, at least if used alone. Sixty percent is also the proportion of migraineurs who develop migraine‐like episodes following experimental intravenous administration of trigeminal neuropeptides and roughly 60% is the percentage of patients with a unilateral migraine tracing the area of cutaneous distribution of the trigeminal ophthalmic branch. Hence, mechanisms other than the trigeminovascular activation are probably involved in the 40% of migraineurs who do not respond to TTTs. A closer cooperation between clinical and basic neuroscientists is needed to explore migraine models because only a careful appraisal of migraine endophenotypes may help to unravel their underlying multifaceted pathophysiological machinery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏头痛的三叉神经靶向治疗:60%是神奇的数字吗?
三叉神经靶向治疗(TTTs)是迄今为止最具特异性和选择性的偏头痛治疗方法,无论治疗类型或机制如何,至少在单独使用时,对大约60%的患者有效。60%的偏头痛患者在实验性静脉注射三叉神经肽后出现偏头痛样发作,大约60%是单侧偏头痛患者在三叉神经眼支皮肤分布区域的百分比。因此,三叉神经血管激活以外的机制可能与40%对ttt无反应的偏头痛患者有关。临床和基础神经科学家之间需要更密切的合作来探索偏头痛模型,因为只有仔细评估偏头痛的内表型才能帮助解开其潜在的多方面病理生理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
American Headache Society 66th Annual Scientific Meeting June 13–16, 2024 San Diego, California A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zolmitriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine in patients aged 6 to 11 years, with an open‐label extension Narrative review of peripheral nerve blocks for the management of headache The 15‐day threshold in the definition of chronic migraine is reasonable and sufficient—Five reasons for not changing the ICHD‐3 definition Migraine with aura associates with a higher artificial intelligence: ECG atrial fibrillation prediction model output compared to migraine without aura in both women and men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1