The Effects of Early Rehabilitation and Diaphragm Kinesiotaping on Diaphragm Muscle Thickness in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit

S. Akseli̇m, T. Dandinoglu, S. Topal, G. Calıskan
{"title":"The Effects of Early Rehabilitation and Diaphragm Kinesiotaping on Diaphragm Muscle Thickness in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit","authors":"S. Akseli̇m, T. Dandinoglu, S. Topal, G. Calıskan","doi":"10.46310/tjim.1279770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The efficacy of early rehabilitation in patients in the intensive care unit is apparent. However, it is still unclear in COVID-19 patients. Also, the effects of diaphragm kinesiotaping on outcomes and muscle thickness were not shown previously. Thus, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of rehabilitation and diaphragm kinesiotaping in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia by evaluating with the ultrasonography of the diaphragm. \nMethods Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit requiring high flow oxygen therapy included in the study. Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit requiring high flow oxygen therapy were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 22) rehabilitation, group 2 (n = 26) rehabilitation and diaphragm kinesiotaping, Group 3 (n = 24) control group-only standard intensive care unit care. Ultrasonographic measurements of diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction were recorded repeatedly. \nResults The demographic characteristics, mortality, and length of stay were not different between groups. However, invasive mechanic ventilation requirement and the decrease in diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction values were significantly lower in the diaphragm kinesiotaping group. Baseline diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction values were found to impact invasive mechanic ventilation requirement. Cut-off values for these parameters are 2.85 mm and 37.95%, respectively. \nConclusion Baseline diaphragm thickness can be used to predict noninvasive ventilation failure. By the way, the patients who are more likely to develop respiratory failure should receive inspiratory muscle training exercises combined with general rehabilitation principles. Also, diaphragm kinesiotaping should be included in the rehabilitation protocol.","PeriodicalId":23372,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1279770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The efficacy of early rehabilitation in patients in the intensive care unit is apparent. However, it is still unclear in COVID-19 patients. Also, the effects of diaphragm kinesiotaping on outcomes and muscle thickness were not shown previously. Thus, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of rehabilitation and diaphragm kinesiotaping in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia by evaluating with the ultrasonography of the diaphragm. Methods Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit requiring high flow oxygen therapy included in the study. Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit requiring high flow oxygen therapy were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 22) rehabilitation, group 2 (n = 26) rehabilitation and diaphragm kinesiotaping, Group 3 (n = 24) control group-only standard intensive care unit care. Ultrasonographic measurements of diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction were recorded repeatedly. Results The demographic characteristics, mortality, and length of stay were not different between groups. However, invasive mechanic ventilation requirement and the decrease in diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction values were significantly lower in the diaphragm kinesiotaping group. Baseline diaphragm thickness and thickening fraction values were found to impact invasive mechanic ventilation requirement. Cut-off values for these parameters are 2.85 mm and 37.95%, respectively. Conclusion Baseline diaphragm thickness can be used to predict noninvasive ventilation failure. By the way, the patients who are more likely to develop respiratory failure should receive inspiratory muscle training exercises combined with general rehabilitation principles. Also, diaphragm kinesiotaping should be included in the rehabilitation protocol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房重症COVID-19肺炎患者早期康复和膈肌运动贴敷对膈肌厚度的影响
目的对重症监护病房患者进行早期康复治疗的效果明显。然而,在COVID-19患者中尚不清楚。此外,膈肌运动贴敷对预后和肌肉厚度的影响先前未被证实。因此,我们旨在通过膈肌超声检查评估康复和膈肌运动贴敷在重症COVID-19肺炎患者中的疗效。方法选择重症监护病房需要高流量氧疗的重症COVID-19肺炎患者。将重症监护病房需要高流量氧疗的COVID-19重症肺炎患者分为3组:1组(n = 22)康复组,2组(n = 26)康复并膈肌运动贴敷组,3组(n = 24)对照组(仅进行标准重症监护病房护理)。反复记录超声测量膜片厚度和增厚分数。结果两组患者的人口学特征、死亡率和住院时间无显著差异。然而,有创机械通气需求、膈膜厚度和增厚分数值的下降明显低于膈肌运动包扎组。发现基线隔膜厚度和增厚分数值影响有创机械通气要求。这些参数的截止值分别为2.85 mm和37.95%。结论基线膈膜厚度可用于无创通气失败的预测。顺便说一下,更容易发生呼吸衰竭的患者应该接受吸气肌训练,并结合一般康复原则。此外,膈肌运动胶带应包括在康复方案中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turkish Nephrology on the 100th Anniversary of the Republic Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Followed at the Intensive Care Unit after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (Fisher Grade IV) Surgery:A Retrospective Study Adrenal Cystic Lymphangioma with Radiological, Clinical and Histopathological Findings, Case report. An Unusual Cause of Bilateral Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report of Primary Adrenal Lymphoma An underestimated old friend: Serum protein electrophoresis in the differential diagnosis of glomerulopathies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1