Keeping Everyone on Board: Gregory the Great’s ‘Theory of Iconoclasm’

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES European Review Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI:10.1017/S1062798722000345
B. Crostini
{"title":"Keeping Everyone on Board: Gregory the Great’s ‘Theory of Iconoclasm’","authors":"B. Crostini","doi":"10.1017/S1062798722000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pope Gregory the Great (s. 590–604) wrote two letters to Bishop Serenus of Marseilles, reproaching his acts of iconoclasm that had led to schism in his community. These short documents are considered to contain Gregory’s theory of art as a book for the illiterate and have been criticized for destroying the aura of sacred art to all subsequent Western developments. Here, I argue that the pope’s fundamental contribution is to offer instead a theory of iconoclasm. Relying on previous ideas about the pedagogical and communicative power of art and its ability to reach a larger audience beyond the elite, Gregory defends the rights of the community of ‘gentiles and illiterates’ who find in portable painted panels an expression of their identity in the church at Marseilles. Serenus’s wish to impose a superior orthodoxy on the pious if incorrect habits of his flock cannot justify his resorting to iconoclasm. The pope’s vigorous condemnation protects the vulnerable minority and sets an important precedent against any acts of iconoclasm in the West.","PeriodicalId":46095,"journal":{"name":"European Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798722000345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pope Gregory the Great (s. 590–604) wrote two letters to Bishop Serenus of Marseilles, reproaching his acts of iconoclasm that had led to schism in his community. These short documents are considered to contain Gregory’s theory of art as a book for the illiterate and have been criticized for destroying the aura of sacred art to all subsequent Western developments. Here, I argue that the pope’s fundamental contribution is to offer instead a theory of iconoclasm. Relying on previous ideas about the pedagogical and communicative power of art and its ability to reach a larger audience beyond the elite, Gregory defends the rights of the community of ‘gentiles and illiterates’ who find in portable painted panels an expression of their identity in the church at Marseilles. Serenus’s wish to impose a superior orthodoxy on the pious if incorrect habits of his flock cannot justify his resorting to iconoclasm. The pope’s vigorous condemnation protects the vulnerable minority and sets an important precedent against any acts of iconoclasm in the West.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让所有人都参与进来:格列高利大帝的“圣像破坏理论”
教皇格列高利大帝(公元590-604年)给马赛主教塞雷诺斯写了两封信,谴责他的破坏圣像的行为导致了他所在社区的分裂。这些简短的文件被认为包含了格列高利的艺术理论,作为一本文盲的书,并被批评为破坏了所有随后的西方发展的神圣艺术的光环。在这里,我认为教皇的根本贡献是提出了一种打破圣像的理论。依靠先前关于艺术的教学和交流能力的想法,以及它能够接触到精英以外的更多观众的能力,格里高利捍卫了“异教徒和文盲”社区的权利,他们在马赛教堂的便携式彩绘板上找到了他们身份的表达。塞雷诺斯希望将一种优越的正统观念强加给他的羊群中那些不正确的虔诚习惯,但这并不能证明他诉诸于破坏圣像的行为是正当的。教皇的强烈谴责保护了弱势群体,并为西方反对任何破坏圣像的行为树立了一个重要的先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Review
European Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Review is a unique interdisciplinary international journal covering a wide range of subjects. It has a strong emphasis on Europe and on economics, history, social science, and general aspects of the sciences. At least two issues each year are devoted mainly or entirely to a single subject and deal in depth with a topic of contemporary importance in Europe; the other issues cover a wide range of subjects but may include a mini-review. Past issues have dealt with: Who owns the Human Genome; From decolonisation to post-colonialism; The future of the welfare state; Democracy in the 21st century; False confessions after repeated interrogation; Living in real and virtual worlds.
期刊最新文献
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in the Mathematics Community: A Perspective on Data and Policy The Experience of the Migration Component of European Identity for the Central Asia Region – ERRATUM Introduction to Publishing in Academia: Digital Challenges Multilingualism in Scientific Literature Communicated by Journals from the SciELO Brazil Collection Beyond Transformative Agreements: Ways Forward for Universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1