{"title":"Projecting grade-specific enrollments for school catchment areas: An evaluation of two methods","authors":"Jayajit Chakraborty, Gerard Rushton","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historical enrollment data for the catchment areas of individual schools are rarely useful for projecting future enrollments because their boundaries are frequently adjusted to balance growth and decline in the enrollments of individual schools. The modifiable spatial-filter method (MSF) was developed to meet this problem (Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995). In this article, a modifiable catchment area method (MCA) is developed, and the performance of the two methods is compared in one school district. Both methods use individual, address-matched, student records, but are different in the way they spatially aggregate these data to estimate key model parameters. Results are clearly sensitive to these differences. We apply both methods retroactively to the address-matched student records, from 1989 through 1992, of 16 elementary schools in one school district in Iowa, and we project the 1993–1996 enrollments for 17 school catchment areas in the district. We show that the average of the results of the two methods produce projections that are more accurate than either method alone. We also show that it is the nonstationarity of model parameters that leads to different levels of performance by the two methods in certain parts of the study region. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":100107,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geographic Studies","volume":"2 3","pages":"157-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geographic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6319%28199823%292%3A3%3C157%3A%3AAID-AGS1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Historical enrollment data for the catchment areas of individual schools are rarely useful for projecting future enrollments because their boundaries are frequently adjusted to balance growth and decline in the enrollments of individual schools. The modifiable spatial-filter method (MSF) was developed to meet this problem (Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995). In this article, a modifiable catchment area method (MCA) is developed, and the performance of the two methods is compared in one school district. Both methods use individual, address-matched, student records, but are different in the way they spatially aggregate these data to estimate key model parameters. Results are clearly sensitive to these differences. We apply both methods retroactively to the address-matched student records, from 1989 through 1992, of 16 elementary schools in one school district in Iowa, and we project the 1993–1996 enrollments for 17 school catchment areas in the district. We show that the average of the results of the two methods produce projections that are more accurate than either method alone. We also show that it is the nonstationarity of model parameters that leads to different levels of performance by the two methods in certain parts of the study region. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
预测学校集水区特定年级的入学人数:对两种方法的评估
个别学校集水区的历史入学数据很少用于预测未来的入学人数,因为它们的边界经常被调整以平衡个别学校入学人数的增长和下降。可修改空间滤波方法(MSF)的发展就是为了解决这个问题(Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995)。本文提出了一种改进的集水区法(MCA),并对两种方法在一个学区的效果进行了比较。这两种方法都使用个人的、地址匹配的学生记录,但它们在空间上聚合这些数据以估计关键模型参数的方式不同。结果显然对这些差异很敏感。我们将这两种方法追溯应用于爱荷华州一个学区的16所小学1989年至1992年的地址匹配学生记录,并对该学区17所学校集水区1993-1996年的入学情况进行了预测。我们表明,两种方法结果的平均值产生的预测比单独使用任何一种方法都更准确。我们还表明,正是模型参数的非平稳性导致两种方法在研究区域的某些部分的性能水平不同。©1998 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。