Comparison of Three Methods for Preparation of Autologous Cells for Use in Cell Therapy of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in People with Diabetes.

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Problems & Language Planning Pub Date : 2022-04-24 DOI:10.1177/15347346221095954
Jitka Husakova, Robert Bem, Alexandra Jirkovska, Andrea Nemcova, Vladimira Fejfarova, Karol Sutoris, Michal Kahle, Edward B Jude, Michal Dubsky
{"title":"Comparison of Three Methods for Preparation of Autologous Cells for Use in Cell Therapy of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in People with Diabetes.","authors":"Jitka Husakova, Robert Bem, Alexandra Jirkovska, Andrea Nemcova, Vladimira Fejfarova, Karol Sutoris, Michal Kahle, Edward B Jude, Michal Dubsky","doi":"10.1177/15347346221095954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autologous cell therapy (ACT) is a new therapeutic approach for diabetic patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (NO-CLTI). The aim of our study was to quantify cell populations of cell therapy products (CTPs) obtained by three different isolation methods and to correlate their numbers with changes in transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO<sub>2</sub>). CTPs were separated either from stimulated peripheral blood (PB) (n = 11) or harvested from bone marrow (BM) processed either by Harvest SmartPReP2 (n = 50) or sedimented with succinate gelatin (n = 29). The clinical effect was evaluated by the change in TcPO<sub>2</sub> after 1, 3 and 6 months. TcPO<sub>2</sub> increased significantly in all three methods at each time point in comparison with baseline values (<i>p</i> < .01) with no significant difference among them. There was no correlation between the change in TcPO<sub>2</sub> and the size of injected cell populations. We only observed a weak correlation between the number of injected white blood cells (WBC) and an increase in TcPO<sub>2</sub> at 1 and 3 months. Our study showed that all three isolation methods of ACT were similarly relatively efficient in the treatment of NO-CLTI. We observed no correlation of TcPO<sub>2</sub> increase with the number of injected monocytes, lymphocytes or CD34<sup>+</sup>. We observed a weak correlation between TcPO<sub>2</sub> increase and the number of injected WBCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":"35 1","pages":"15347346221095954"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Problems & Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346221095954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autologous cell therapy (ACT) is a new therapeutic approach for diabetic patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (NO-CLTI). The aim of our study was to quantify cell populations of cell therapy products (CTPs) obtained by three different isolation methods and to correlate their numbers with changes in transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2). CTPs were separated either from stimulated peripheral blood (PB) (n = 11) or harvested from bone marrow (BM) processed either by Harvest SmartPReP2 (n = 50) or sedimented with succinate gelatin (n = 29). The clinical effect was evaluated by the change in TcPO2 after 1, 3 and 6 months. TcPO2 increased significantly in all three methods at each time point in comparison with baseline values (p < .01) with no significant difference among them. There was no correlation between the change in TcPO2 and the size of injected cell populations. We only observed a weak correlation between the number of injected white blood cells (WBC) and an increase in TcPO2 at 1 and 3 months. Our study showed that all three isolation methods of ACT were similarly relatively efficient in the treatment of NO-CLTI. We observed no correlation of TcPO2 increase with the number of injected monocytes, lymphocytes or CD34+. We observed a weak correlation between TcPO2 increase and the number of injected WBCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较三种用于糖尿病患者慢性肢体缺血细胞疗法的自体细胞制备方法
自体细胞疗法(ACT)是一种治疗糖尿病患者无选择性慢性肢体缺血(NO-CLTI)的新方法。我们的研究旨在量化通过三种不同分离方法获得的细胞治疗产品(CTPs)的细胞群,并将其数量与经皮血氧压(TcPO2)的变化联系起来。CTPs是从受刺激的外周血(PB)(n = 11)中分离出来的,或是从经 Harvest SmartPReP2 处理(n = 50)或用琥珀酸明胶沉淀(n = 29)的骨髓(BM)中获得的。临床效果通过 1、3 和 6 个月后 TcPO2 的变化进行评估。与基线值(p 2)和注射细胞群的大小相比,所有三种方法在每个时间点的 TcPO2 都有明显增加。我们只观察到注射白细胞(WBC)的数量与 1 个月和 3 个月后 TcPO2 的增加之间存在微弱的相关性。我们的研究表明,ACT 的三种分离方法在治疗 NO-CLTI 方面同样相对有效。我们观察到 TcPO2 的增加与注射的单核细胞、淋巴细胞或 CD34+ 的数量无关。我们观察到 TcPO2 的增加与注射的白细胞数量之间存在微弱的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Language Problems and Language Planning is published in cooperation with the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems. This international multi-lingual journal publishes articles primarily on political, sociological, and economic aspects of language and language use. It is especially concerned with relationships between and among language communities, particularly in international contexts, and in the adaptation, manipulation, and standardization of language for international use.
期刊最新文献
Review of Salomone (2022): The rise of English: Global politics and the power of language Review of Wright & Higgins (2021): Diversifying Family Language Policy Review of Faingold (2020): Language Rights and the Law in the European Union Translation policies in times of a pandemic Review of Barandovská-Frank (2020): Interlingvistiko. Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1