Morphometric parameters of eggs from breeds quail for meat

N. German, A. Vetokh, A. Dzhagaev, E.R. Ilyina, T. Kotova
{"title":"Morphometric parameters of eggs from breeds quail for meat","authors":"N. German, A. Vetokh, A. Dzhagaev, E.R. Ilyina, T. Kotova","doi":"10.30917/att-vk-1814-9588-2023-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper shows the results of assessing eggs quality by morphometric and morphological indicators from meat-type quails, identifying significant differences in the quality indicators of the egg, which are responsible for the incubation and commercial qualities of the egg. In total, 360 eggs from 50 females were tested from Pharaoh and Texas White quails per month. Eggs for this study were collected from the age of 90 days. The shelf life of quail eggs was no more than 2 days from the moment of laying; the storage temperature was not higher than 15 ? at an average air humidity was 75%. The collection of morphological parameters (weight of the whole egg and its components) and biophysical parameters (elastic deformation of the egg, strength and thickness of the shell) was carried out on a highly sensitive analyzer Stable Micro Systems, Ohaus laboratory electronic scales and using a caliper. During the analysis of the eggs, significant differences in the morphological parameters of the eggs were established. The Texas White quail was superior to the Pharaoh quail and had at 2% more elongated shape (at the egg index). In both meat breeds shell thickness was 0.27 mm an average, howewer the difference was found in the shell thickness without an under shell membrane, namely the true shell. From the Texas quail it was 1.12 times thinner than from the Pharaoh quail. The color of the yolk in Texas white quails was more yellow, under the same conditions of keeping and feeding. The quality of protein in quails of both genotypes in our study was high, which indicates their suitability for incubation, and corresponds to good commercial qualities. However, it should be noted that the Pharaoh breed was inferior in HU by 3.78%, in IQU by 4.19%, and the protein index was 1.28 times less than that of the Texas quail.","PeriodicalId":23579,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria i kormlenie","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria i kormlenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30917/att-vk-1814-9588-2023-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper shows the results of assessing eggs quality by morphometric and morphological indicators from meat-type quails, identifying significant differences in the quality indicators of the egg, which are responsible for the incubation and commercial qualities of the egg. In total, 360 eggs from 50 females were tested from Pharaoh and Texas White quails per month. Eggs for this study were collected from the age of 90 days. The shelf life of quail eggs was no more than 2 days from the moment of laying; the storage temperature was not higher than 15 ? at an average air humidity was 75%. The collection of morphological parameters (weight of the whole egg and its components) and biophysical parameters (elastic deformation of the egg, strength and thickness of the shell) was carried out on a highly sensitive analyzer Stable Micro Systems, Ohaus laboratory electronic scales and using a caliper. During the analysis of the eggs, significant differences in the morphological parameters of the eggs were established. The Texas White quail was superior to the Pharaoh quail and had at 2% more elongated shape (at the egg index). In both meat breeds shell thickness was 0.27 mm an average, howewer the difference was found in the shell thickness without an under shell membrane, namely the true shell. From the Texas quail it was 1.12 times thinner than from the Pharaoh quail. The color of the yolk in Texas white quails was more yellow, under the same conditions of keeping and feeding. The quality of protein in quails of both genotypes in our study was high, which indicates their suitability for incubation, and corresponds to good commercial qualities. However, it should be noted that the Pharaoh breed was inferior in HU by 3.78%, in IQU by 4.19%, and the protein index was 1.28 times less than that of the Texas quail.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉用鹌鹑品种蛋的形态计量参数
本文展示了用形态计量学和形态学指标评价肉型鹌鹑蛋品质的结果,发现蛋的品质指标存在显著差异,这些指标决定了蛋的孵化和商品品质。每月总共对50只雌性法老白鹌鹑和德克萨斯白鹌鹑的360个蛋进行检测。本研究的鸡蛋是从90日龄开始收集的。鹌鹑蛋自下蛋之日起保质期不超过2天;贮存温度不高于15℃。平均空气湿度为75%。形态学参数(全蛋重量及其组成部分)和生物物理参数(蛋的弹性变形、蛋壳的强度和厚度)的采集在高灵敏度分析仪Stable Micro Systems、Ohaus实验室电子秤和卡尺上进行。在对卵的分析中,发现卵的形态参数存在显著差异。德克萨斯白鹌鹑优于法老鹌鹑,其长形(蛋指数)高出2%。两个肉用品种的平均壳厚均为0.27 mm,但在无下壳膜即真壳的壳厚上存在差异。德克萨斯鹌鹑比法老鹌鹑细1.12倍。在饲养和饲养条件相同的情况下,德克萨斯白鹌鹑的蛋黄颜色偏黄。本研究中两种基因型鹌鹑的蛋白质质量都很高,表明它们适合孵育,具有良好的商业品质。但值得注意的是,法老品种的HU和IQU分别比德克萨斯鹌鹑低3.78%和4.19%,蛋白质指数比德克萨斯鹌鹑低1.28倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of natural prebiotic additives on the economic and biological qualities of rabbits Evaluation of qualitative indicators of epididymal sperm of goats before and after cryopreservation Characteristics of destructive changes in the distal limbs of cattle in the conditions of industrial cattle breeding Monitoring of blood parameters in highproductive cows of the transit period with abomasum displacement Seasonal dynamics of immunophysiological parameters of Oncorhynchus mykiss organism when grown in cages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1