Parent perspectives on food allergy management and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic

A. Russell, Olga Kagan, M. Huber
{"title":"Parent perspectives on food allergy management and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"A. Russell, Olga Kagan, M. Huber","doi":"10.2500/jfa.2020.1.200033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: U.S. national emergency was declared in mid-March 2020 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, a period of stay-at-home orders, regulatory changes, evolving medical recommendations, and food supply chain disruptions occurred. There\n is little published research on how such changes affected food allergy management for children with this diagnosis. Objective: The study goal was to identify parent perspectives with regard to if and/or how pandemic-related regulatory changes and evolving medical recommendations\n have affected food allergy management. Methods: A survey was distributed to parents of children with food allergy. An electronic Internet forms survey link was available for completion during July 2020. Data were presented as descriptive statistics, cleaned, and coded into\n a spreadsheet before analysis . Frequencies and percentage were calculated to describe participants’ characteristics and responses. Results: Of 377 responses, 359 met inclusion criteria. Concerns about COVID-19 exposure were expressed in 65.7% about accessing an emergency\n department and 73.6% had school reentry concerns; 66% had not discussed recommended anaphylaxis management algorithm changes with a provider; 85.8% had not discussed the temporary U.S. Food and Drug Administration food labeling policy with a provider. Most (62%) reported shortages of preferred\n safe food brands. 62% spent more time cooking safe foods from scratch. With regard to the recommendation by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for classroom dining, 57.7% planned to request modifications. With regard to the CDC’s recommendation to use inhalers\n versus nebulizers, 37.7% had not discussed the topic with a provider. Ninety-two written comments were analyzed and grouped into seven themes. Conclusion: New pandemic-related regulations, food supply chain disruptions, and evolving medical recommendations resulted in intensified\n burdens for respondents, including the increased time needed to complete food allergy management and school reentry concerns. Study results can inform clinical team members (e.g., physicians, nurses, dieticians) of effects that pandemic-related changes may have on this patient population,\n with subsequent consideration of patient-specific screening, education, and shared decision-making with regard to risk mitigation needs.","PeriodicalId":73751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food allergy","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/jfa.2020.1.200033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: U.S. national emergency was declared in mid-March 2020 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, a period of stay-at-home orders, regulatory changes, evolving medical recommendations, and food supply chain disruptions occurred. There is little published research on how such changes affected food allergy management for children with this diagnosis. Objective: The study goal was to identify parent perspectives with regard to if and/or how pandemic-related regulatory changes and evolving medical recommendations have affected food allergy management. Methods: A survey was distributed to parents of children with food allergy. An electronic Internet forms survey link was available for completion during July 2020. Data were presented as descriptive statistics, cleaned, and coded into a spreadsheet before analysis . Frequencies and percentage were calculated to describe participants’ characteristics and responses. Results: Of 377 responses, 359 met inclusion criteria. Concerns about COVID-19 exposure were expressed in 65.7% about accessing an emergency department and 73.6% had school reentry concerns; 66% had not discussed recommended anaphylaxis management algorithm changes with a provider; 85.8% had not discussed the temporary U.S. Food and Drug Administration food labeling policy with a provider. Most (62%) reported shortages of preferred safe food brands. 62% spent more time cooking safe foods from scratch. With regard to the recommendation by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for classroom dining, 57.7% planned to request modifications. With regard to the CDC’s recommendation to use inhalers versus nebulizers, 37.7% had not discussed the topic with a provider. Ninety-two written comments were analyzed and grouped into seven themes. Conclusion: New pandemic-related regulations, food supply chain disruptions, and evolving medical recommendations resulted in intensified burdens for respondents, including the increased time needed to complete food allergy management and school reentry concerns. Study results can inform clinical team members (e.g., physicians, nurses, dieticians) of effects that pandemic-related changes may have on this patient population, with subsequent consideration of patient-specific screening, education, and shared decision-making with regard to risk mitigation needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间家长对食物过敏管理和安全的看法
背景:由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,美国于2020年3月中旬宣布全国进入紧急状态。随后,出现了一段时间的居家令、监管变化、不断发展的医疗建议和食品供应链中断。关于这些变化如何影响患有这种诊断的儿童的食物过敏管理的研究很少发表。目的:本研究的目的是确定家长对与大流行相关的监管变化和不断发展的医学建议是否和/或如何影响食物过敏管理的看法。方法:对食物过敏患儿家长进行问卷调查。电子互联网表格调查链接将于2020年7月完成。数据以描述性统计数据的形式呈现,在分析之前进行清理并编码到电子表格中。计算频率和百分比来描述参与者的特征和反应。结果:377份回复中,359份符合纳入标准。65.7%的人对进入急诊科表示担忧,73.6%的人对重返学校表示担忧;66%的患者未与医疗服务提供者讨论推荐的过敏反应管理算法变更;85.8%的人没有与供应商讨论美国食品和药物管理局的临时食品标签政策。大多数人(62%)报告说,缺乏首选的安全食品品牌。62%的人花更多的时间从零开始烹饪安全食品。对于美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)对教室餐饮的建议,57.7%的人计划要求修改。至于CDC建议使用吸入器而不是雾化器,37.7%的人没有与供应商讨论过这个话题。对92条书面评论进行了分析,并将其分为七个主题。结论:新的大流行相关法规、食品供应链中断和不断变化的医疗建议加重了应答者的负担,包括完成食物过敏管理所需的时间增加和重新入学问题。研究结果可以告知临床团队成员(如医生、护士、营养师)与大流行相关的变化可能对该患者群体产生的影响,随后考虑针对患者的筛查、教育和关于风险缓解需求的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The public health burden of parent-reported food allergy-related missed school days among US children. A decade of progress in prevention and management of food allergy and anaphylaxis. A diagnostic approach to IgE-mediated food allergy: A practical algorithm. Anaphylaxis: Definition and criteria. Epinephrine autoinjectors for individuals with food allergy: Who, how many, and when to use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1