Expert Method as a Quality Assessment Tool of a Multifunctional Hospital

Dunamalyan R.A, Mardiyan M.A, Mkrtchyan S.A, Sakanyan G.H
{"title":"Expert Method as a Quality Assessment Tool of a Multifunctional Hospital","authors":"Dunamalyan R.A, Mardiyan M.A, Mkrtchyan S.A, Sakanyan G.H","doi":"10.36648/1479-1072.21.29.88-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The systematic structural transformation of the system and the introduction of new technologies are not enough to create an effective system for the medical quality control. It is supposed, that the health care quality management system will be phased, so, it is necessary to emphasize the change in management decisions of medical care quality. The purpose of the research is to alter the traditional scheme of medical expertise conceptualization into innovation, which is based on effective motivation of staff. The object of the study was Astghik Medical Center, which is a multi-functional medical center. Combining medical errors with different components of medical care quality, determines the degree of their significance, which allows dividing medical error into 4 classes. Taking into account the severity of the medical error, the degree of discrepancy is divided into 6 classes. We have developed a Medical Record Examination Questionnaire: 340 medical records have been examined. The research results show, that, the second class of health care quality discrepancy is most common. As a result of analyzing, the following errors were discovered: Gather information about the patient (25.5%), drug therapy -the absence of the prescribed medication, the improper use of the medication (0.8%), error in treatment continuity (10.8%). The received data indicate that it is necessary to develop and introduce managerial decisions that will result in a reduction of medical care discrepancy error. In order to achieve this goal it is necessary to set up a working group, whose staff is desirable to involve the chiefs of departments and the assistant of chief doctor. Thus, managing of medical care quality within the limits of a separate medical institution confirms, that medical care quality can be improved by correctly using information about quality, by purposeful activity of the head, which will be aimed at solving main problem of medical care quality.","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1479-1072.21.29.88-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systematic structural transformation of the system and the introduction of new technologies are not enough to create an effective system for the medical quality control. It is supposed, that the health care quality management system will be phased, so, it is necessary to emphasize the change in management decisions of medical care quality. The purpose of the research is to alter the traditional scheme of medical expertise conceptualization into innovation, which is based on effective motivation of staff. The object of the study was Astghik Medical Center, which is a multi-functional medical center. Combining medical errors with different components of medical care quality, determines the degree of their significance, which allows dividing medical error into 4 classes. Taking into account the severity of the medical error, the degree of discrepancy is divided into 6 classes. We have developed a Medical Record Examination Questionnaire: 340 medical records have been examined. The research results show, that, the second class of health care quality discrepancy is most common. As a result of analyzing, the following errors were discovered: Gather information about the patient (25.5%), drug therapy -the absence of the prescribed medication, the improper use of the medication (0.8%), error in treatment continuity (10.8%). The received data indicate that it is necessary to develop and introduce managerial decisions that will result in a reduction of medical care discrepancy error. In order to achieve this goal it is necessary to set up a working group, whose staff is desirable to involve the chiefs of departments and the assistant of chief doctor. Thus, managing of medical care quality within the limits of a separate medical institution confirms, that medical care quality can be improved by correctly using information about quality, by purposeful activity of the head, which will be aimed at solving main problem of medical care quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家法在多功能医院质量评价中的应用
仅靠系统的结构改造和新技术的引进,不足以形成有效的医疗质量控制体系。医疗质量管理体系将逐步建立,因此,必须重视医疗质量管理决策的变化。本研究的目的是改变传统的医学专业知识概念化方案,以有效的员工激励为基础进行创新。研究对象为Astghik医疗中心,这是一家多功能医疗中心。将医疗差错与医疗质量的不同组成部分结合起来,确定其重要程度,从而将医疗差错分为4类。考虑到医疗差错的严重程度,差异程度分为6级。我们编制了一份病历检查调查表,共检查了340份病历。研究结果表明,第二类医疗质量差异最为普遍。通过分析,发现了以下错误:收集患者信息(25.5%),药物治疗-没有处方药物,药物使用不当(0.8%),治疗连续性错误(10.8%)。收到的数据表明,有必要制定和实行管理决策,以减少医疗差错。为了实现这一目标,有必要成立一个工作组,其工作人员最好包括科室主任和主任医生助理。因此,在一个单独的医疗机构范围内管理医疗质量证实,通过正确使用质量信息,通过负责人有目的的活动,可以提高医疗质量,这将旨在解决医疗质量的主要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating improvement. Understanding processes and how to improve them. Commissioning for quality improvement. The Impact 0f Pandemic Ebola Virus 0n Global Public Health Preterm birth and factors: An institution based cross-sectional study in case of southern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1