How do public sector auditors perceive the concept and practice of auditor Independence? Evidence from Indonesia

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1080/23276665.2022.2110910
Ahmad Rizki, M. Turner
{"title":"How do public sector auditors perceive the concept and practice of auditor Independence? Evidence from Indonesia","authors":"Ahmad Rizki, M. Turner","doi":"10.1080/23276665.2022.2110910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Independence is widely regarded as one of the key principles of effective auditing. This article explores the understanding of the nature of auditor independence at the level of practice in the public sector using the case study of Indonesia’s Supreme Audit Institution (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan-Republik Indonesia – BPK-RI). The research uses a case study methodology involving in-depth interviews with a stratified sample comprised of four groups of BPK-RI auditors. The results confirm that independence is perceived by all respondents as a fundamental auditor value. Independence was found to be a multifaceted concept which was perceived by respondents to have personal, professional and organisational aspects. However, depending on one’s location in the organisational hierarchy there are different emphases about the relative importance of the different aspects of auditor independence.","PeriodicalId":43945,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2110910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Independence is widely regarded as one of the key principles of effective auditing. This article explores the understanding of the nature of auditor independence at the level of practice in the public sector using the case study of Indonesia’s Supreme Audit Institution (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan-Republik Indonesia – BPK-RI). The research uses a case study methodology involving in-depth interviews with a stratified sample comprised of four groups of BPK-RI auditors. The results confirm that independence is perceived by all respondents as a fundamental auditor value. Independence was found to be a multifaceted concept which was perceived by respondents to have personal, professional and organisational aspects. However, depending on one’s location in the organisational hierarchy there are different emphases about the relative importance of the different aspects of auditor independence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门审计师如何看待审计师独立性的概念和实践?来自印度尼西亚的证据
独立性被广泛认为是有效审计的关键原则之一。本文通过对印度尼西亚最高审计机构(Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan-Republik Indonesia - BPK-RI)的案例研究,探讨了在公共部门实践层面对审计师独立性本质的理解。该研究采用案例研究方法,涉及对由四组BPK-RI审计师组成的分层样本进行深入访谈。调查结果证实,所有受访者都认为独立性是审计师的一项基本价值。独立被发现是一个多方面的概念,被受访者认为有个人、专业和组织方面。然而,根据一个人在组织层级中的位置,对审计师独立性不同方面的相对重要性有不同的强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Religiosity and work motives among public sector employees The role of Confucian values in Korean administrative culture: a cultural-contextual perspective Change management, performance feedback, and public service motivation: cultivating change-oriented behaviour in public organisations Exploring the effectiveness of youth outreach programmes: the case of Singapore The brave new world of AI: implications for public sector agents, organisations, and governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1