Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Results with Zero-Profile Spacer/Cage

Tariq Imran Khokhar, Sumaira Kiran, Muhammad Naveed Majeed, Khawar Anwar, Asif Bashir
{"title":"Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Results with Zero-Profile Spacer/Cage","authors":"Tariq Imran Khokhar, Sumaira Kiran, Muhammad Naveed Majeed, Khawar Anwar, Asif Bashir","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i1.656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  Study provides proof to support the promised benefits of employing stand-alone zero-profile cages in multilevel ACDF procedures, as the stand-alone zero-profile device has proven safety and a reduction of the risk of dysphagia in single-level ACDF surgeries. Materials and Methods:  This is a retrospective descriptive study, conducted at the Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan. Data of 36 patients evaluated for post-operative dysphagia and fusion, who had multi-level ACDF surgery employing stand-alone zero-profile cages. Results:  Total of 36 patients underwent ACDF surgeries. 86.1% (31/36) patients operated for 2 levels and 13.9% (5/36) patients operated for 3 levels. Dysphagia developed postoperatively in 2 (5.6%) patients in which zero-profile stand-alone cages were used. Fusion was achieved in 94.4% (34/36) patients. Conclusion:  Stand-alone zero-profile cages in multi-level ACDF surgeries have a good outcome in terms of post-operative less dysphagia and higher fusion rates. Keywords:  Anterior Cervical Discectomy (Decompression) And Fusion (ACDF), Zero-Profile Cages, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i1.656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Study provides proof to support the promised benefits of employing stand-alone zero-profile cages in multilevel ACDF procedures, as the stand-alone zero-profile device has proven safety and a reduction of the risk of dysphagia in single-level ACDF surgeries. Materials and Methods:  This is a retrospective descriptive study, conducted at the Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan. Data of 36 patients evaluated for post-operative dysphagia and fusion, who had multi-level ACDF surgery employing stand-alone zero-profile cages. Results:  Total of 36 patients underwent ACDF surgeries. 86.1% (31/36) patients operated for 2 levels and 13.9% (5/36) patients operated for 3 levels. Dysphagia developed postoperatively in 2 (5.6%) patients in which zero-profile stand-alone cages were used. Fusion was achieved in 94.4% (34/36) patients. Conclusion:  Stand-alone zero-profile cages in multi-level ACDF surgeries have a good outcome in terms of post-operative less dysphagia and higher fusion rates. Keywords:  Anterior Cervical Discectomy (Decompression) And Fusion (ACDF), Zero-Profile Cages, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合手术:使用零轮廓间隔器/笼的结果
目的:研究提供证据支持在多节段ACDF手术中使用独立式零轮廓笼的好处,因为在单节段ACDF手术中,独立式零轮廓装置已被证明是安全的,并降低了吞咽困难的风险。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性描述性研究,在巴基斯坦拉合尔旁遮普省神经科学研究所进行。36例术后吞咽困难和融合患者,采用独立的零侧笼进行多级ACDF手术。结果:36例患者行ACDF手术。86.1%(31/36)的患者行2节段手术,13.9%(5/36)的患者行3节段手术。2例(5.6%)患者术后出现吞咽困难,其中使用了零轮廓独立笼。94.4%(34/36)患者实现融合。结论:独立的零轮廓笼在多级ACDF手术中具有较好的效果,术后吞咽困难较少,融合率较高。关键词:颈前路椎间盘切除术(减压)和融合(ACDF),零轮廓笼,脊髓型颈椎病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational biomarkers for the decision of neurosurgical treatment for brain tumors Outcomes of Management of Pituitary Adenoma by Use of Octreotide Injections Preoperatively Metallic Foreign Body in the Neck – a Rare Incidence Comparison of the Efficacy of Fusion with Non-Fusion Treatment for Recurrent Lumber Disc Herniation (RLDH) Impact of Intracranial Pressure-Monitored Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1