Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Toward Job Creation Law in The Mineral and Coal Mining Sector

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.29303/ius.v10i3.1132
Lelisari Lelisari, Ridho Aulia Tanjung, Zainal Abidin Pakpahan, Imawanto Imawanto, H. Hamdi
{"title":"Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Toward Job Creation Law in The Mineral and Coal Mining Sector","authors":"Lelisari Lelisari, Ridho Aulia Tanjung, Zainal Abidin Pakpahan, Imawanto Imawanto, H. Hamdi","doi":"10.29303/ius.v10i3.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and examine the juridical implications of the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU XVII/2020 on the job creation law in the mineral and coal mining sector. The research method used is a normative legal research method with approach legislation. The results illustrate that the juridical implication of the Job Creation Act in the mineral and coal mining sector is that in its decision the Constitutional Court stated that the Job Creation Act was still valid as long as the law-makers made improvements in the procedures for establishing Job Creation Law. In this case, the Constitutional Court has given two years for the legislators to revise the procedure for the formation of the Job Creation Law since the decision was pronounced. If no improvements are made, the Law can be declared unconstitutional permanently. Thus, if Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation is unconstitutional, namely permanently removing coal incentive opportunities, the elimination of coal incentive opportunities must indeed be carried out due to the targets of coal utilization in Article 128A, not power optimization towards clean energy and will increase the portion of coal in the national energy mix and overall will systematically overlap with climate adaptation and mitigation targets and programs as well as the Articles in the Job Creation Act are also infiltrated by the interests of mining and dirty energy businesses.","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and examine the juridical implications of the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU XVII/2020 on the job creation law in the mineral and coal mining sector. The research method used is a normative legal research method with approach legislation. The results illustrate that the juridical implication of the Job Creation Act in the mineral and coal mining sector is that in its decision the Constitutional Court stated that the Job Creation Act was still valid as long as the law-makers made improvements in the procedures for establishing Job Creation Law. In this case, the Constitutional Court has given two years for the legislators to revise the procedure for the formation of the Job Creation Law since the decision was pronounced. If no improvements are made, the Law can be declared unconstitutional permanently. Thus, if Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation is unconstitutional, namely permanently removing coal incentive opportunities, the elimination of coal incentive opportunities must indeed be carried out due to the targets of coal utilization in Article 128A, not power optimization towards clean energy and will increase the portion of coal in the national energy mix and overall will systematically overlap with climate adaptation and mitigation targets and programs as well as the Articles in the Job Creation Act are also infiltrated by the interests of mining and dirty energy businesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法法院第91/Puu-Xviii/2020号决定对矿产和煤矿部门创造就业法的影响
本研究旨在分析和审查第91/PUU XVII/2020号宪法法院关于矿产和煤炭开采部门创造就业法的决定的法律含义。本文采用的研究方法是一种接近立法的规范性法律研究方法。结果表明,《创造就业机会法》在矿物和煤炭开采部门的法律含义是,宪法法院在其判决中指出,只要立法者改进制定《创造就业机会法》的程序,《创造就业机会法》仍然有效。因此,宪法裁判所在做出决定后,给了议员们2年时间修改《创造就业机会法》的制定程序。如果不作出改进,该法律将被永久宣布为违宪。因此,如果关于创造就业机会的2020年第11号法律违宪,即永久取消煤炭激励机会,那么由于第128A条的煤炭利用目标,必须确实取消煤炭激励机会。这将增加煤炭在国家能源结构中的比例,总体上将系统地与气候适应和减缓目标和计划重叠,以及《创造就业法案》中的条款也被采矿和肮脏能源企业的利益所渗透。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
ISPO Policy on Palm Oil Industry and Biodiesel Development in North Aceh Guidance Concept for Convicts in Penitentiary as Legal Means to Minimize Narcotics Abuse Maximum Limitation of Fines for Economic Crimes In Law Number 1 of 2023 The Future of Sex Robots in Indonesia: Law, Science, And Technology Pancasila's Economic Existence in Business Development: The Efforts to Realize Justice in Business Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1