Revisiting Constant Market Share Analysis, An Application to NAFTA (Abridged Version)

H. Escaith
{"title":"Revisiting Constant Market Share Analysis, An Application to NAFTA (Abridged Version)","authors":"H. Escaith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3916981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Devising well-behaved constant market share decomposition indices has been the pursuit of many researchers since the 1950s. This article proposes a new formulation of constant market share (CMS) trade analysis inspired by the statistical principles supporting revealed comparative advantages (RCA). This novel approach is methodologically consistent and rooted in information theory. It avoids also the discrete-form residuals that plague traditional CMS analysis, while remaining simple to compute. It is shown that both CMSD and RCA can be paired together in order to shed light on the dynamics of competitiveness and comparative advantages in international trade. This abridged version corresponds to the methodological sections of the publication “Revisiting constant market share analysis, an application to NAFTA” published by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. In the original version, the new “comparative market share analysis” decomposition (CMSD) is applied to the changes in the structure and origin of United States imports after the implementation of NAFTA.","PeriodicalId":18516,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Production","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3916981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Devising well-behaved constant market share decomposition indices has been the pursuit of many researchers since the 1950s. This article proposes a new formulation of constant market share (CMS) trade analysis inspired by the statistical principles supporting revealed comparative advantages (RCA). This novel approach is methodologically consistent and rooted in information theory. It avoids also the discrete-form residuals that plague traditional CMS analysis, while remaining simple to compute. It is shown that both CMSD and RCA can be paired together in order to shed light on the dynamics of competitiveness and comparative advantages in international trade. This abridged version corresponds to the methodological sections of the publication “Revisiting constant market share analysis, an application to NAFTA” published by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. In the original version, the new “comparative market share analysis” decomposition (CMSD) is applied to the changes in the structure and origin of United States imports after the implementation of NAFTA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视恒定市场份额分析,在北美自由贸易协定中的应用(节选版)
自20世纪50年代以来,设计出性能良好的恒定市场份额分解指数一直是许多研究人员的追求。本文在支持显性比较优势(RCA)的统计原理的启发下,提出了一种新的恒市场份额贸易分析公式。这种新颖的方法在方法论上是一致的,并且植根于信息论。它还避免了困扰传统CMS分析的离散形式残差,同时保持计算简单。研究表明,CMSD和RCA可以结合在一起,以揭示国际贸易中竞争力和比较优势的动态。这一节略版本与拉丁美洲和加勒比经济委员会出版的出版物“重新审视恒定市场份额分析,适用于北美自由贸易协定”的方法部分相对应。在原版本中,新的“比较市场份额分析”分解(CMSD)适用于北美自由贸易协定实施后美国进口产品结构和原产地的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pricing the Pharmaceuticals When the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously Dual Role Platforms and Search Order Distortion Monopoly, Product Quality and Information Disclosure Production Approach Markup Estimators Often Measure Input Wedges Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1