Learning needs, barriers, differences and study requirements: How students identify as 'disabled' in higher education

K. Lister, Tim Coughlan, N. Owen
{"title":"Learning needs, barriers, differences and study requirements: How students identify as 'disabled' in higher education","authors":"K. Lister, Tim Coughlan, N. Owen","doi":"10.5456/wpll.22.1.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher educational institutions (HEIs) often categorise certain students as 'disabled' in order to support inclusive and equitable study. 'Disabled' students studying in higher education may be asked to 'disclose a disability', request and agree 'reasonable adjustments' that their institution\n will 'provide' them, and engage with processes such as applying for 'Disabled Students' Allowance'. However, there is little understanding of preferences and comfort with language in this area, and if students do not i dentify with terms such as 'disabled', this can create barriers to requesting\n or accessing support. This paper describes a qualitative study to investigate language preferences for common points of communication with the HEI. We held interviews and focus groups with students (n=12) and utilised discourse analysis to investigate the language used and student perceptions\n of language. We identified three distinct models of language used to discuss study needs relating to a 'disability', each with language nor ms and specific nomenclature. Furthermore, we found divergence in preferences in language, leading us to argue that differential and inclusive approaches\n to language use should be explored.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"19 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.22.1.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Higher educational institutions (HEIs) often categorise certain students as 'disabled' in order to support inclusive and equitable study. 'Disabled' students studying in higher education may be asked to 'disclose a disability', request and agree 'reasonable adjustments' that their institution will 'provide' them, and engage with processes such as applying for 'Disabled Students' Allowance'. However, there is little understanding of preferences and comfort with language in this area, and if students do not i dentify with terms such as 'disabled', this can create barriers to requesting or accessing support. This paper describes a qualitative study to investigate language preferences for common points of communication with the HEI. We held interviews and focus groups with students (n=12) and utilised discourse analysis to investigate the language used and student perceptions of language. We identified three distinct models of language used to discuss study needs relating to a 'disability', each with language nor ms and specific nomenclature. Furthermore, we found divergence in preferences in language, leading us to argue that differential and inclusive approaches to language use should be explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习需求、障碍、差异和学习要求:学生如何在高等教育中识别“残疾”
高等教育机构经常将某些学生归类为“残疾”学生,以支持包容和公平的学习。在高等教育中学习的“残疾”学生可能会被要求“披露残疾”,要求并同意他们的机构将“提供”他们的“合理调整”,并参与申请“残疾学生津贴”等流程。然而,在这方面,学生对语言的偏好和舒适度知之甚少,如果学生不认同“残疾”这样的术语,这可能会给请求或获得支持造成障碍。本文描述了一项定性研究,以调查与高等教育机构的共同交流点的语言偏好。我们对学生进行了访谈和焦点小组(n=12),并利用话语分析来调查使用的语言和学生对语言的感知。我们确定了用于讨论与“残疾”相关的学习需求的三种不同的语言模型,每种模型都有语言或ms和特定的术语。此外,我们发现在语言偏好上存在差异,这使我们认为应该探索不同和包容的语言使用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1