Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients: evidence for effectiveness

Rodger S Kessler PhD , David R Patterson PhD , Joseph Dane PhD
{"title":"Hypnosis and relaxation with pain patients: evidence for effectiveness","authors":"Rodger S Kessler PhD ,&nbsp;David R Patterson PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph Dane PhD","doi":"10.1016/S1537-5897(03)00019-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hypnosis<span> and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101158,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1537-5897(03)00019-3","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537589703000193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Hypnosis and relaxation are prominent ancillary clinical techniques in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. This article evaluates the evidence and support for the use of these techniques as part of medical treatment. Questions are raised about the utility of grouping hypnosis and relaxation together and we review a continuum of self-regulation techniques upon which hypnosis and self regulation appear to be points. We conclude that we are not yet able to identify a continuum of effectiveness despite there being significant support for hypnotic interventions and some, but more modest, support for relaxation. In addition to clarifying methodological dilemmas we urge that future research must specifically assess hypnotic suggestibility independent of whether the intervention is or is not hypnosis, evaluate non-specific effects, and review dose effect as part of further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠和放松对疼痛患者:有效性的证据
催眠和放松是治疗急慢性疼痛的重要辅助临床技术。本文评估了使用这些技术作为医疗的一部分的证据和支持。关于催眠和放松组合在一起的效用提出了问题,我们回顾了自我调节技术的连续体,催眠和自我调节似乎是点。我们的结论是,我们还不能确定连续的有效性,尽管对催眠干预有显著的支持,对放松也有一些(但更温和的)支持。除了澄清方法学上的困境外,我们敦促未来的研究必须特别评估催眠暗示性,无论干预是否是催眠,评估非特异性影响,并审查剂量效应,作为进一步研究的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Table of contents Editorial board Clinical relevance and ethical aspects of placebos Opioid and placebo analgesia share the same network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1