Revascularization Failure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

A. Islam, A. Reza, S. Munwar, S. Talukder
{"title":"Revascularization Failure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting","authors":"A. Islam, A. Reza, S. Munwar, S. Talukder","doi":"10.3329/cardio.v15i1.61915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in our Bangladeshi patient population. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are the gold standard of revascularization to treat these group of patients. Both treatment modalities may contribute to both short term and long-term excellent benefit with the relief of symptoms and improves quality of life. Beside the availability of modern techniques along with 3rd generation Drug eluting stents (DES) for PCI and uses of arterial conduit in bypass surgery, in long-term follow-up, many of the patient needs repeat revascularization. In Bangladesh, many of the centers are doing state of the art treatment with the available of most of interventional aids in treating complex PCI as well as primary PCI. Similarly, CABG with the advent and available expertise, minimal invasive bypass surgery or beating heart surgery, facilitate CABG more convenient for patient and surgeons as well. Exact data on stent occlusion or graft failure that may leads to repeat revascularization is not well understood in our circumstances. We need to form a common consensus, if needed, to form a national registry or database to follow up PCI or CABG patients who develop subsequent revascularization failure and address the reason behind. Thus, to reduce the needs of repeat revascularization and improve long term quality of life.\nCardiovasc j 2022; 15(1): 81-85","PeriodicalId":9438,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v15i1.61915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in our Bangladeshi patient population. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are the gold standard of revascularization to treat these group of patients. Both treatment modalities may contribute to both short term and long-term excellent benefit with the relief of symptoms and improves quality of life. Beside the availability of modern techniques along with 3rd generation Drug eluting stents (DES) for PCI and uses of arterial conduit in bypass surgery, in long-term follow-up, many of the patient needs repeat revascularization. In Bangladesh, many of the centers are doing state of the art treatment with the available of most of interventional aids in treating complex PCI as well as primary PCI. Similarly, CABG with the advent and available expertise, minimal invasive bypass surgery or beating heart surgery, facilitate CABG more convenient for patient and surgeons as well. Exact data on stent occlusion or graft failure that may leads to repeat revascularization is not well understood in our circumstances. We need to form a common consensus, if needed, to form a national registry or database to follow up PCI or CABG patients who develop subsequent revascularization failure and address the reason behind. Thus, to reduce the needs of repeat revascularization and improve long term quality of life. Cardiovasc j 2022; 15(1): 81-85
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血运重建失败:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是导致孟加拉国患者死亡和发病的主要原因之一。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是治疗这类患者血运重建术的金标准。这两种治疗方式都可能有助于缓解症状和提高生活质量的短期和长期的良好效益。除了现代技术的可用性以及第三代药物洗脱支架(DES)用于PCI和旁路手术中动脉导管的使用,在长期随访中,许多患者需要重复血运重建术。在孟加拉国,许多中心正在进行最先进的治疗,在治疗复杂的PCI和初级PCI方面,大多数介入辅助设备都是可用的。同样,CABG的出现和现有的专业技术,微创搭桥手术或心脏跳动手术,使CABG对患者和外科医生都更方便。在我们的情况下,可能导致重复血运重建的支架闭塞或移植物失败的确切数据尚不清楚。如果需要的话,我们需要形成一个共识,建立一个全国性的登记或数据库,对PCI或CABG患者进行后续血运重建失败的随访,并找出其背后的原因。从而减少重复血运重建的需要,提高长期生活质量。心血管病杂志[j] 2022;15 (1): 81 - 85
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Outcome of Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in a Specialized center in Bangladesh Historic photos related to Cardiac Surgery in Bangladesh Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcome Between Intermittent Intravenous Heparin versus Continuous Heparin Infusion after Initial Bolus Dose during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Use of the Left Ventricular Internal Dimension at End-Diastole and the Mitral Valve E-Point Septal Separation Ratio in the Prediction of the Left Ventricular Systolic Function Remembering Christiaan Barnard in Philately
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1