O6 Teaching communication skills in the Covid-19 era: an online workshop for medical students

R. Johnston, C. Sen, Y. Baki
{"title":"O6 Teaching communication skills in the Covid-19 era: an online workshop for medical students","authors":"R. Johnston, C. Sen, Y. Baki","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Effective communication is a fundamental aspect of good medical practice. It has been shown to enhance patient safety and care1 yet poor communication continues to be cited as a leading cause of adverse events, patient dissatisfaction and complaints.2 Communication skills programs have shown improvements in communication beyond that achieved by standard patient encounters3 however amidst the Covid-19 pandemic face-to-face training opportunities are limited. We developed a real-time online workshop to teach undergraduate communication skills in a virtual environment. Methods We designed a multimodal programme utilising Kolb’s experiential learning cycle4 to meet the learning objectives identified on the paediatric undergraduate curriculum (see figure 1). We introduced the session exploring students’ objectives with focus on creating a psychologically safe environment. A pre-recorded simulated ‘breaking bad news’ scenario followed, interspersed with group reflection on the management of non-accidental injuries, approaches to difficult discussions and dealing with conflict. Students then role-played in break-out groups: (i) disclosure of a medication error and (ii) obtaining consent for a lumbar puncture followed by peer-led feedback and group reflection. We surveyed students’ confidence of the learning objectives prior to and after the workshop collecting quantitative and qualitative feedback. We also considered the feasibility of the session including resources required, technical issues and levels of student engagement. Results The session was delivered on Blackboard Collaborate, a virtual classroom tool, by three paediatricians and attended by 26 students. Internet connectivity issues were minimal and using a web-based application (Articulate Rise) ensured video quality was preserved. The video observation and opportunity to practice and interact with peers in small groups were rated highly by students. Breakout groups stimulated active learning with students describing the role play as ‘daunting’ but ‘really useful’. Monitoring student engagement was challenging but high usage of the interactive whiteboard was encouraging. Confidence in all learning outcomes improved following the workshop (pre->post test% of students self-assessed as confident): talking to anxious parents (0->83.3%); explaining common procedures and investigations (13.6->100%); obtaining consent (13.6->91.7%); breaking bad news (22.7->66.6%) and explaining safeguarding concerns (0->58.3%). Discussion and Conclusion Undergraduate paediatric curriculums must address essential competencies in communication. This is particularly challenging in the Covid-19 era with reduced clinical exposure. We found online workshops are feasible, require minimal resources and are well received by students. Utilising online small group personal tutor sessions, we plan to repeat this workshop regularly over the next academic year. References Poore JA, Cullen DL, Schaar GL. Simulation-based interprofessional education guided by Kolb’s experiential learning theory. Clin Simul Nurs 2014;10(5):e241-e247. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004 Abdelrahman Wedad AA. Understanding patient complaints. BMJ 2017;356:452. Haak R, Rosenbohm J, Koerfer A, Obliers R, Wicht MJ. The effect of undergraduate education in communication skills: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12(4):213–218. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00521.x Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Med Teach 2012(2);34: doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Effective communication is a fundamental aspect of good medical practice. It has been shown to enhance patient safety and care1 yet poor communication continues to be cited as a leading cause of adverse events, patient dissatisfaction and complaints.2 Communication skills programs have shown improvements in communication beyond that achieved by standard patient encounters3 however amidst the Covid-19 pandemic face-to-face training opportunities are limited. We developed a real-time online workshop to teach undergraduate communication skills in a virtual environment. Methods We designed a multimodal programme utilising Kolb’s experiential learning cycle4 to meet the learning objectives identified on the paediatric undergraduate curriculum (see figure 1). We introduced the session exploring students’ objectives with focus on creating a psychologically safe environment. A pre-recorded simulated ‘breaking bad news’ scenario followed, interspersed with group reflection on the management of non-accidental injuries, approaches to difficult discussions and dealing with conflict. Students then role-played in break-out groups: (i) disclosure of a medication error and (ii) obtaining consent for a lumbar puncture followed by peer-led feedback and group reflection. We surveyed students’ confidence of the learning objectives prior to and after the workshop collecting quantitative and qualitative feedback. We also considered the feasibility of the session including resources required, technical issues and levels of student engagement. Results The session was delivered on Blackboard Collaborate, a virtual classroom tool, by three paediatricians and attended by 26 students. Internet connectivity issues were minimal and using a web-based application (Articulate Rise) ensured video quality was preserved. The video observation and opportunity to practice and interact with peers in small groups were rated highly by students. Breakout groups stimulated active learning with students describing the role play as ‘daunting’ but ‘really useful’. Monitoring student engagement was challenging but high usage of the interactive whiteboard was encouraging. Confidence in all learning outcomes improved following the workshop (pre->post test% of students self-assessed as confident): talking to anxious parents (0->83.3%); explaining common procedures and investigations (13.6->100%); obtaining consent (13.6->91.7%); breaking bad news (22.7->66.6%) and explaining safeguarding concerns (0->58.3%). Discussion and Conclusion Undergraduate paediatric curriculums must address essential competencies in communication. This is particularly challenging in the Covid-19 era with reduced clinical exposure. We found online workshops are feasible, require minimal resources and are well received by students. Utilising online small group personal tutor sessions, we plan to repeat this workshop regularly over the next academic year. References Poore JA, Cullen DL, Schaar GL. Simulation-based interprofessional education guided by Kolb’s experiential learning theory. Clin Simul Nurs 2014;10(5):e241-e247. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004 Abdelrahman Wedad AA. Understanding patient complaints. BMJ 2017;356:452. Haak R, Rosenbohm J, Koerfer A, Obliers R, Wicht MJ. The effect of undergraduate education in communication skills: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12(4):213–218. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00521.x Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Med Teach 2012(2);34: doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎时代的沟通技巧教学:医学生在线研讨会
有效的沟通是良好医疗实践的一个基本方面。它已被证明可以提高病人的安全和护理,但不良的沟通仍然被认为是不良事件、病人不满和抱怨的主要原因沟通技巧项目已显示出沟通能力的提高,超出了标准患者接触所能达到的水平,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,面对面培训的机会有限。我们开发了一个实时在线研讨会,在虚拟环境中教授本科生沟通技巧。我们设计了一个多模式课程,利用科尔布的体验式学习周期4来满足儿科本科课程中确定的学习目标(见图1)。我们介绍了探索学生目标的课程,重点是创造一个心理安全的环境。随后是预先录制的模拟“突发坏消息”场景,其间穿插着小组对非意外伤害管理、困难讨论的方法和处理冲突的反思。然后,学生们在分组中扮演角色:(i)披露用药错误;(ii)获得腰椎穿刺的同意,随后进行同伴反馈和小组反思。我们调查了学生在研讨会前后对学习目标的信心,收集了定量和定性的反馈。我们还考虑了会议的可行性,包括所需资源、技术问题和学生参与程度。结果:该课程由3名儿科医生在Blackboard协作虚拟课堂工具上授课,共有26名学生参加。互联网连接问题很小,使用基于网络的应用程序(articelrise)确保了视频质量。学生们对视频观看以及小组练习和与同龄人互动的机会评价很高。分组讨论小组鼓励学生积极学习,学生们形容角色扮演“令人生畏”,但“非常有用”。监控学生的参与度是一项挑战,但互动式白板的高使用率令人鼓舞。在研讨会之后,所有学习成果的信心都有所提高(测试前-测试后,自评自信的学生百分比):与焦虑的父母交谈(0-测试后,83.3%);解释常见程序和调查(13.6->100%);获得同意(13.6- 91.7%);发布坏消息(22.7- 66.6%)和解释安全问题(0- 58.3%)。讨论与结论:本科儿科课程必须强调沟通的基本能力。这在Covid-19时代尤其具有挑战性,因为临床接触减少了。我们发现在线研讨会是可行的,需要最少的资源,并受到学生的欢迎。利用在线小组个人辅导课程,我们计划在下一学年定期重复这个研讨会。Poore JA, Cullen DL, Schaar GL.基于Kolb体验学习理论的跨专业模拟教育。临床护理杂志,2014,10(5):e241-e247。doi: 10.3969 / j.i ssn .2014.01.004 Abdelrahman Wedad AA。了解病人的抱怨。BMJ 2017; 356:452。李建军,李建军,李建军,李建军。本科教育对沟通技巧的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。[J]中国生物医学工程学报,2008;12(4):213-218。doi: 10.1111 / j.1600-0579.2008.00521。[6]王晓明,王晓明,王晓明,等。体验式学习:英语教学指南第63期。医学教学2012(2);34:doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1