Access in Book History Methodology and Pedagogy: Report from the "Touch to See" Workshop

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 N/A FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION FILM CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1353/crt.2022.a899726
Amanda Stuckey
{"title":"Access in Book History Methodology and Pedagogy: Report from the \"Touch to See\" Workshop","authors":"Amanda Stuckey","doi":"10.1353/crt.2022.a899726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article theorizes methodological transparency in intersections of book history and pedagogy. To illuminate the intersections of accessible pedagogy and liberation bibliography, I describe the process of planning and conducting an archive-based workshop submitted to the Bibliographical Society of America. The workshop focuses on one book object: an 1836 New Testament embossed in raised roman letters meant to be read by the fingers of low-vision and blind students. The workshop especially seeks to reach community and traditionally nonacademic spaces, both virtual and on-site. Workshop participants discuss and reflect on the relationships among education access, disability history, and the book as a material object. We emphasize the merging of method with material: in the same way that the embossed book attempted to make literacy accessible to blind and low-vision readers, this workshop must be accessible to a range of participants and tailored to the individual needs and preferences of those registered. Reflecting on the planning, conducting, and aftermath of this workshop, I suggest that the workshop potentially merges disability pedagogy and liberation bibliography: interdependence is not only acknowledged but also privileged; hierarchies are not only identified but also unpacked; and knowledge is made rather than received. I build this theorization from participant's contributions, feedback, and meta-reflections that assess the workshop on multiple levels, from access to content.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.a899726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article theorizes methodological transparency in intersections of book history and pedagogy. To illuminate the intersections of accessible pedagogy and liberation bibliography, I describe the process of planning and conducting an archive-based workshop submitted to the Bibliographical Society of America. The workshop focuses on one book object: an 1836 New Testament embossed in raised roman letters meant to be read by the fingers of low-vision and blind students. The workshop especially seeks to reach community and traditionally nonacademic spaces, both virtual and on-site. Workshop participants discuss and reflect on the relationships among education access, disability history, and the book as a material object. We emphasize the merging of method with material: in the same way that the embossed book attempted to make literacy accessible to blind and low-vision readers, this workshop must be accessible to a range of participants and tailored to the individual needs and preferences of those registered. Reflecting on the planning, conducting, and aftermath of this workshop, I suggest that the workshop potentially merges disability pedagogy and liberation bibliography: interdependence is not only acknowledged but also privileged; hierarchies are not only identified but also unpacked; and knowledge is made rather than received. I build this theorization from participant's contributions, feedback, and meta-reflections that assess the workshop on multiple levels, from access to content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书籍历史的存取方法与教学法:来自“触摸看”工作坊的报告
摘要:本文对书史与教育学交叉领域的方法论透明度进行了理论化研究。为了阐明无障碍教学法和解放目录学的交叉点,我描述了向美国书目学会提交的一个基于档案的研讨会的规划和实施过程。研讨会的重点是一本书:1836年的《新约》,用凸起的罗马字母压花,供弱视和失明的学生用手指阅读。研讨会特别寻求接触社区和传统的非学术空间,包括虚拟和现场。研讨会参与者讨论和反思教育机会、残疾历史和作为实物的书籍之间的关系。我们强调方法与材料的融合:就像压花书试图让盲人和低视力读者能够阅读一样,这个研讨会必须对一系列参与者开放,并根据注册者的个人需求和偏好进行定制。反思这次研讨会的计划、实施和后果,我认为研讨会有可能将残疾教育学和解放书目结合起来:相互依存不仅得到承认,而且得到了特权;层次结构不仅被识别,而且被拆解;知识是创造出来的,而不是接受来的。我从参与者的贡献、反馈和元反思中构建了这个理论,这些反思从访问到内容的多个层面上评估了研讨会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
期刊最新文献
Fast Zombies and Social Rights: The Case of Umberto Lenzi’s Nightmare City (1980) Neo-Imperial Island Fantasy in Contemporary French Reality TV: The Case of Koh-Lanta The Guilty Spectator: Sexuality, Age, Crime and Dario Argento’s Deep Red (1975) “To Become a Devil”: Special Effects, Magic Tricks, and the Technological Image in Faust Transforming Cultural Memory: Inglorius Basterds (2009)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1