India-UK Investment Relations and ‘Global Britain’

Prabhash Ranjan
{"title":"India-UK Investment Relations and ‘Global Britain’","authors":"Prabhash Ranjan","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2023.2187616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political commentators in the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere have written much about the theme of ‘Global Britain’ that started to emerge after the UK’s decision to exit from the European Union (Brexit). The concept of ‘Global Britain’ is about the UK reinvesting in its relationships with other countries, championing a rule-based international order, and signalling an assertive, inclusive, outward-facing, and free-trading Britain. While some criticise this theme as a vision of ‘Empire 2.0′, some argue that there are inherent contradictions in the theme of ‘Global Britain’ due to a high anti-globalism sentiment that led to Brexit, on the one hand, and the UK’s desire to forge new trade deals with several countries, on the other. One of the important pillars of the ‘Global Britain’ theme is the UK’s role as an energetic champion of free and open trade. As part of this initiative, the UK has signed several free trade agreements (FTAs) and is also negotiating many more with countries like India. India figures prominently in the vision of Global Britain. As part of Global Britain’s Indo-Pacific strategy, the UK is desirous of deepening its","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"33 1","pages":"120 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2187616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political commentators in the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere have written much about the theme of ‘Global Britain’ that started to emerge after the UK’s decision to exit from the European Union (Brexit). The concept of ‘Global Britain’ is about the UK reinvesting in its relationships with other countries, championing a rule-based international order, and signalling an assertive, inclusive, outward-facing, and free-trading Britain. While some criticise this theme as a vision of ‘Empire 2.0′, some argue that there are inherent contradictions in the theme of ‘Global Britain’ due to a high anti-globalism sentiment that led to Brexit, on the one hand, and the UK’s desire to forge new trade deals with several countries, on the other. One of the important pillars of the ‘Global Britain’ theme is the UK’s role as an energetic champion of free and open trade. As part of this initiative, the UK has signed several free trade agreements (FTAs) and is also negotiating many more with countries like India. India figures prominently in the vision of Global Britain. As part of Global Britain’s Indo-Pacific strategy, the UK is desirous of deepening its
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印英投资关系与“全球化英国”
在英国决定退出欧盟(Brexit)之后,英国和其他地方的政治评论员已经写了很多关于“全球化英国”的主题。“全球化英国”的概念是指英国对与其他国家的关系进行再投资,支持以规则为基础的国际秩序,并表明英国是一个自信、包容、外向和自由贸易的英国。虽然有些人批评这一主题是“帝国2.0”的愿景,但有些人认为,“全球化英国”的主题存在内在矛盾,一方面,由于高度的反全球化情绪导致英国脱欧,另一方面,英国希望与几个国家达成新的贸易协议。“全球化的英国”主题的一个重要支柱是英国作为自由开放贸易的积极倡导者。作为该倡议的一部分,英国已经签署了几项自由贸易协定,并正在与印度等国谈判更多自由贸易协定。印度在“全球化英国”的愿景中占有突出地位。作为“全球英国”印太战略的一部分,英国希望深化印太战略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1