Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochronology Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023
P. Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, J. Schwanethal, Y. Buret
{"title":"Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis","authors":"P. Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, J. Schwanethal, Y. Buret","doi":"10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique\nthat combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass\nspectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass\nspectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital)\nthermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to\npersistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current\nin situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He\nmeasurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in\ncontrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar\nabundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by\nisotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so\neasy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration\nstandards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required\nmolar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is\nhigher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself\ndifficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this\nproblem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for\nablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known\nU–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using\nrelative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot\nexperiments show that the new method produces accurate results.\nHowever, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to\ngradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and\ntheir effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and\nthe standard during the proton irradiation.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique that combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass spectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital) thermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to persistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current in situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He measurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in contrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar abundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by isotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so easy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration standards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required molar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is higher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself difficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this problem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for ablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known U–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using relative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot experiments show that the new method produces accurate results. However, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to gradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and their effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and the standard during the proton irradiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术说明:用4He∕3He激光微探针分析原位U-Th-He定年
摘要原位U-Th-He地质年代学是一种结合激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)和激光微探针惰性气体质谱的潜在颠覆性技术。尽管有可能彻底改变(碎屑)热年代学,但由于持续的分析挑战,原位U-Th-He测年并未广泛应用。一个主要问题是,目前的原位U - Th - he测年方法要求以摩尔浓度为单位来表示U、Th和hem3的测量值,而传统方法则使用摩尔丰度为单位。虽然摩尔丰度可以通过同位素稀释可靠地确定,但精确的浓度测量并不容易获得。在缺乏与基体匹配的U-Th浓度标准和精确的He烧蚀坑测量的情况下,所需的摩尔浓度计算引入了比传统方法更高的不确定度,这种不确定度本身难以准确量化。我们提出了一个解决这个问题的方法,用质子诱导的3He作为烧蚀坑体积的代理,并将样品与已知的nu - th - he年龄标准配对。因此,U-Th-He年龄方程可以用相对浓度而不是绝对浓度测量来求解。实验结果表明,该方法能得到准确的结果。然而,它很容易发生过色散,这是由于质子通量的梯度。这些梯度可以测量,并且可以通过在质子辐照期间固定样品和标准品的几何形状来消除它们的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geochronological and geochemical effects of zircon chemical abrasion: insights from single-crystal stepwise dissolution experiments The marine reservoir age of Greenland coastal waters Late Neogene terrestrial climate reconstruction of the central Namib Desert derived by the combination of U–Pb silcrete and terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating Early Holocene ice retreat from Isle Royale in the Laurentian Great Lakes constrained with 10Be exposure-age dating Technical note: Darkroom lighting for luminescence dating laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1