Rôles protecteurs de l’activité de travail, du soutien social perçu et des stratégies de coping en période de confinement et de crise sanitaire

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pto.2021.02.002
A. Delicourt
{"title":"Rôles protecteurs de l’activité de travail, du soutien social perçu et des stratégies de coping en période de confinement et de crise sanitaire","authors":"A. Delicourt","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2021.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study is to determine what organizational and personal factors may have protected workers, placed in different professional status (in the office, teleworking or absence of activity at home) from developing anxiety during the lockdown in the spring 2020 in France. Effects of professional status and personal resources mobilized in these different contexts, through coping strategies and perceived social support, have been studied. Three hundred and twenty-seven public officials were interviewed. The results show that work activity protects from anxiety, like social support from colleagues and friends. Emotion-focused coping strategies has been deleterious unlike problem-focused ones. The family situation does not seem to have had an effect. This study highlights the positive role that work, both in terms of activity and relationships, may have had on individuals during this period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 75-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253021000078/pdfft?md5=45047377829cef299b374507da6f321b&pid=1-s2.0-S1420253021000078-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253021000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine what organizational and personal factors may have protected workers, placed in different professional status (in the office, teleworking or absence of activity at home) from developing anxiety during the lockdown in the spring 2020 in France. Effects of professional status and personal resources mobilized in these different contexts, through coping strategies and perceived social support, have been studied. Three hundred and twenty-seven public officials were interviewed. The results show that work activity protects from anxiety, like social support from colleagues and friends. Emotion-focused coping strategies has been deleterious unlike problem-focused ones. The family situation does not seem to have had an effect. This study highlights the positive role that work, both in terms of activity and relationships, may have had on individuals during this period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在遏制和健康危机时期,工作活动、感知的社会支持和应对战略的保护作用
本研究的目的是确定哪些组织和个人因素可能保护了处于不同职业地位(在办公室、远程工作或在家没有活动)的工人,使他们在法国2020年春季的封锁期间不会产生焦虑。在这些不同的背景下,通过应对策略和感知的社会支持,研究了职业地位和个人资源调动的影响。327名政府官员接受了采访。结果表明,工作活动可以防止焦虑,比如来自同事和朋友的社会支持。与关注问题的应对策略不同,关注情绪的应对策略是有害的。家庭情况似乎没有影响。这项研究强调了在这一时期,工作在活动和人际关系方面可能对个人产生的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Estime de soi : un médiateur entre le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et le bien-être positif au travail ? Un outil n’est pas fait pour s’épanouir. Le rôle médiateur de l’auto-objectification entre la déshumanisation organisationnelle et l’épanouissement psychologique au travail Engagement de continuité et santé mentale des employés : le rôle des traits d’affectivité
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1