Resistant Dermatophytosis, the Causative Species, and Treatment

Shahad Khudhair Khalaf,, Anaam Fuad Hussain,, Khudhair Khalaf Al-Kayalli, Amenah Khudhair Khalaf
{"title":"Resistant Dermatophytosis, the Causative Species, and Treatment","authors":"Shahad Khudhair Khalaf,, Anaam Fuad Hussain,, Khudhair Khalaf Al-Kayalli, Amenah Khudhair Khalaf","doi":"10.26505/djm.v24i2.998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dermatophytosis was a fungal infection caused by molds (dermatophytes). Dermatophytes are a group of closely related filamentous fungi able to damage and utilize keratin found in the skin, hair, and nails.  Objective: To to isolate the species which cause resistant dermatophytosis, and clinical types of tinea, as well as to assess the response to different antifungal therapies. \nPatients and Methods: Ninety-two patients with different clinical types of tinea infections (ringworm) were seen in a private clinic in Baquba city for the period from May 2021 to December 2021, they were (42) females and (50) males, their ages ranged from (7-70) years with a mean age of (27.57±8) years. All patients were diagnosed clinically as ringworm and supported by isolation of the species from samples either by direct examination of samples or cultures on Sabouraud media, and the patients were treated by combination therapy of systemic and topical terbinafine and systemic azole (itraconazole capsules) for (1-3) months. \nResults: All patients complained of widespread and concomitant tinea. The most common causative dermatophytes species were Epidermopyton floccosum (44%) and Trichophyton rubrum (22%), less commonly Microsporum audouinii (9.8%), and the others as in Table (1). The most common clinical type was tinea pedis (29.3%) then tinea cruris (26.1%), tinea corporis (22.8%), and tinea ungum (20.7%) as in Table (2). \nAll patients were cured on combination therapy of systemic (terbinafine and itraconazole) and topical (terbinafine). Five patients (5.4%) showed relapses of disease after discontinuation of therapy and retreated by the same method. \nConclusion: Epidermophyton floccosum and Trichophyton rubrum were the most common cause of resistant tinea. Terbinafine and itraconazole were good therapeutic options for the treatment of resistant tinea.","PeriodicalId":11202,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Journal of Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26505/djm.v24i2.998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dermatophytosis was a fungal infection caused by molds (dermatophytes). Dermatophytes are a group of closely related filamentous fungi able to damage and utilize keratin found in the skin, hair, and nails.  Objective: To to isolate the species which cause resistant dermatophytosis, and clinical types of tinea, as well as to assess the response to different antifungal therapies. Patients and Methods: Ninety-two patients with different clinical types of tinea infections (ringworm) were seen in a private clinic in Baquba city for the period from May 2021 to December 2021, they were (42) females and (50) males, their ages ranged from (7-70) years with a mean age of (27.57±8) years. All patients were diagnosed clinically as ringworm and supported by isolation of the species from samples either by direct examination of samples or cultures on Sabouraud media, and the patients were treated by combination therapy of systemic and topical terbinafine and systemic azole (itraconazole capsules) for (1-3) months. Results: All patients complained of widespread and concomitant tinea. The most common causative dermatophytes species were Epidermopyton floccosum (44%) and Trichophyton rubrum (22%), less commonly Microsporum audouinii (9.8%), and the others as in Table (1). The most common clinical type was tinea pedis (29.3%) then tinea cruris (26.1%), tinea corporis (22.8%), and tinea ungum (20.7%) as in Table (2). All patients were cured on combination therapy of systemic (terbinafine and itraconazole) and topical (terbinafine). Five patients (5.4%) showed relapses of disease after discontinuation of therapy and retreated by the same method. Conclusion: Epidermophyton floccosum and Trichophyton rubrum were the most common cause of resistant tinea. Terbinafine and itraconazole were good therapeutic options for the treatment of resistant tinea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗性皮肤植物病,致病物种和治疗
背景:皮肤真菌病是一种由霉菌引起的真菌感染。皮肤真菌是一组密切相关的丝状真菌,能够破坏和利用皮肤、头发和指甲中的角蛋白。目的:分离引起耐药皮肤真菌病的菌种,分析其癣的临床类型,并评价其对不同抗真菌治疗的反应。患者与方法:于2021年5月至2021年12月在巴古巴市某私人诊所共收治92例不同临床类型的癣感染(癣)患者,其中女性42例,男性50例,年龄7 ~ 70岁,平均年龄(27.57±8)岁。所有患者均被临床诊断为癣,并通过直接检查样品或Sabouraud培养基培养从样品中分离出癣种,患者接受全身和外用特比萘芬和全身唑(伊曲康唑胶囊)联合治疗(1-3个月)。结果:所有患者均有广泛并发的癣。最常见的致病菌种类为绒皮表皮赘菌(44%)和红毛癣菌(22%),较少见的为奥氏小孢子菌(9.8%),其他见表(1)。最常见的临床类型为足癣(29.3%),其次为斑癣(26.1%)、体癣(22.8%)和无龈癣(20.7%),见表(2)。所有患者均经全身(特比萘芬和伊曲康唑)和外用(特比萘芬)联合治疗。停药后复发5例(5.4%),均采用相同方法治疗。结论:絮状表皮菌和红毛癣菌是引起耐药癣最常见的病原菌。特比萘芬和伊曲康唑是治疗耐药癣的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Some the Cytotoxic Effects of Edible Mushroom Extracts Pleurotus ostreatus The Impact of Practicing Exercise and Risk Factors Categorize in Osteoporotic Concerning Postmenopausal Women (Analytical study using binary logistic regression) Seroprevalence study of Parvovirus B19 among women with miscarriage in Mosul city Localization of the position of vital anatomical structures in the lateral wall of maxillary sinus during different surgical intervention using cone beam computed tomography Effect of saliva of patients with leukemia on surface hardness and roughness of enamel and dental composite resin during chemotherapy regimen: An – Invitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1