A surrogate-model assisted approach for optimising the size of tidal turbine arrays

D.M. Culley , S.W. Funke , S.C. Kramer , M.D. Piggott
{"title":"A surrogate-model assisted approach for optimising the size of tidal turbine arrays","authors":"D.M. Culley ,&nbsp;S.W. Funke ,&nbsp;S.C. Kramer ,&nbsp;M.D. Piggott","doi":"10.1016/j.ijome.2017.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The new and costly nature of tidal stream energy extraction technologies can lead to narrow margins of success for a project. The design process is thus a delicate balancing act – to maximise the energy extracted, while minimising cost and risk. Scenario specific factors, such as site characteristics, technological constraints and practical engineering considerations greatly impact upon both the appropriate number of turbines to include within a tidal current turbine array (array size), and the individual locations of those turbines (turbine micro-siting). Both have been shown to significantly impact upon the energy yield and profitability of an array.</p><p>The micro-siting arrangement for a given number of turbines can significantly influence the power extraction of a tidal farm. Until the layout has been optimised (a process which may incorporate turbine parameters, local bathymetry and a host of other practical, physical, legal, financial or environmental constraints) an accurate forecast of the yield of that array cannot be determined. This process can be thought of as ‘tuning’ an array to the proposed site to maximise desirable outcomes and mitigate undesirable effects.</p><p>The influence of micro-siting on the farm performance means that determining the optimal array size needs to be coupled to the micro-siting process. In particular, the micro-siting needs to be repeated for any new trial array size in order to be able to compare the performance of the different farm sizes. Considering the large number of design variables in the micro-siting problem (which includes at least the positions of each turbine) it becomes clear that algorithmic optimisation is a key tool to rigorously determine the optimal array size and layout.</p><p>This paper proposes a nested optimisation approach for solving the array size and layout problem. The core of this approach consists of two nested optimisation procedures. The ‘outer’ optimisation determines the array size. At each ‘outer’ iteration the power extracted by <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow></math></span> turbines is found via a separate optimisation of their micro-siting on the proposed site. The ‘inner’ optimisation is treated as a computationally expensive black-box solver, mapping array size to power (and additionally returning the optimal micro-siting design). This forms the basis of a practical approach to the array sizing problem based on Bayesian optimisation, in which a surrogate model is built and used to maximise the utility of each evaluation made by the solver.</p><p>This paper introduces and reports on the implementation of this novel surrogate-assisted array design approach which, coupled with a simple financial model is demonstrated through optimisation of array size for two test scenarios to maximise the financial return on the array for the developer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100705,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Marine Energy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 357-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijome.2017.05.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Marine Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214166917300462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The new and costly nature of tidal stream energy extraction technologies can lead to narrow margins of success for a project. The design process is thus a delicate balancing act – to maximise the energy extracted, while minimising cost and risk. Scenario specific factors, such as site characteristics, technological constraints and practical engineering considerations greatly impact upon both the appropriate number of turbines to include within a tidal current turbine array (array size), and the individual locations of those turbines (turbine micro-siting). Both have been shown to significantly impact upon the energy yield and profitability of an array.

The micro-siting arrangement for a given number of turbines can significantly influence the power extraction of a tidal farm. Until the layout has been optimised (a process which may incorporate turbine parameters, local bathymetry and a host of other practical, physical, legal, financial or environmental constraints) an accurate forecast of the yield of that array cannot be determined. This process can be thought of as ‘tuning’ an array to the proposed site to maximise desirable outcomes and mitigate undesirable effects.

The influence of micro-siting on the farm performance means that determining the optimal array size needs to be coupled to the micro-siting process. In particular, the micro-siting needs to be repeated for any new trial array size in order to be able to compare the performance of the different farm sizes. Considering the large number of design variables in the micro-siting problem (which includes at least the positions of each turbine) it becomes clear that algorithmic optimisation is a key tool to rigorously determine the optimal array size and layout.

This paper proposes a nested optimisation approach for solving the array size and layout problem. The core of this approach consists of two nested optimisation procedures. The ‘outer’ optimisation determines the array size. At each ‘outer’ iteration the power extracted by N turbines is found via a separate optimisation of their micro-siting on the proposed site. The ‘inner’ optimisation is treated as a computationally expensive black-box solver, mapping array size to power (and additionally returning the optimal micro-siting design). This forms the basis of a practical approach to the array sizing problem based on Bayesian optimisation, in which a surrogate model is built and used to maximise the utility of each evaluation made by the solver.

This paper introduces and reports on the implementation of this novel surrogate-assisted array design approach which, coupled with a simple financial model is demonstrated through optimisation of array size for two test scenarios to maximise the financial return on the array for the developer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潮汐涡轮机阵列尺寸优化的代理模型辅助方法
潮汐流能源提取技术的新特性和昂贵的特性可能导致项目成功的边际狭窄。因此,设计过程是一个微妙的平衡行为-最大限度地提取能源,同时最小化成本和风险。场景特定因素,如场地特征、技术限制和实际工程考虑,对潮汐流涡轮机阵列中涡轮机的适当数量(阵列尺寸)和这些涡轮机的个别位置(涡轮机微选址)都有很大影响。两者都被证明对阵列的能量产量和盈利能力有显著影响。给定数量的涡轮机的微选址安排可以显著影响潮汐能发电厂的功率提取。在布局优化之前(这一过程可能包括涡轮机参数、当地水深测量以及许多其他实际、物理、法律、财务或环境限制),无法准确预测该阵列的产量。这个过程可以被认为是“调整”一个阵列到拟议的地点,以最大限度地提高理想的结果和减轻不良影响。微定位对农场性能的影响意味着确定最佳阵列尺寸需要与微定位过程相结合。特别是,为了能够比较不同农场规模的性能,任何新的试验阵列规模都需要重复进行微定位。考虑到微选址问题中的大量设计变量(至少包括每个涡轮机的位置),很明显,算法优化是严格确定最佳阵列大小和布局的关键工具。本文提出了一种嵌套优化方法来解决阵列大小和布局问题。该方法的核心由两个嵌套的优化过程组成。外部优化决定了数组的大小。在每次“外部”迭代中,N台涡轮机提取的功率是通过在拟议场地上对其微定位进行单独优化而获得的。“内部”优化被视为计算上昂贵的黑盒求解器,将阵列大小映射到功率(并额外返回最佳微站点设计)。这构成了基于贝叶斯优化的阵列大小问题的实用方法的基础,其中构建代理模型并用于最大化求解器所做的每次评估的效用。本文介绍并报告了这种新颖的代理辅助阵列设计方法的实现,该方法与一个简单的财务模型相结合,通过优化两个测试场景的阵列大小来演示,以最大限度地提高开发人员对阵列的财务回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Physical scale model testing of a flexible membrane wave energy converter: Videogrammetric analysis of membrane operation A comparison of control strategies for wave energy converters Predicted power performance of a submerged membrane pressure-differential wave energy converter Ocean power technology design optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1