Planning to teach difficult history through historical inquiry: The case of school desegregation

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Social Studies Research Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jssr.2020.09.002
Yonghee Suh , Brian Daugherity , Danielle Hartsfield
{"title":"Planning to teach difficult history through historical inquiry: The case of school desegregation","authors":"Yonghee Suh ,&nbsp;Brian Daugherity ,&nbsp;Danielle Hartsfield","doi":"10.1016/j.jssr.2020.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>This exploratory study investigates the ways in which secondary U.S. history teachers who attended two iterations of a teacher professional development workshop, focusing on the history of school desegregation in Virginia, planned to teach the history of school desegregation through </span>historical inquiry. Conceptualizing the history of school desegregation as difficult history, the authors conducted the content analysis of 23 written lesson plans generated by workshop participants. The </span>historiography of school desegregation, and research on four dimensions of historical inquiry such as </span><em>Change and Continuity</em>, <em>Causation</em>, <em>Multiple Perspectives</em> and <em>Historical Sources</em>, guided the data analysis. The findings suggest that teachers in this study were most likely to design their inquiry around <em>Causation</em><span>, framing the history of school desegregation within the classical timeline of the Civil Rights Movement, which begins with the </span><em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> decision (1954) and ends with the Civil Rights Act of 1968. What was often absent in these inquiries was Massive Resistance, the backlash against the <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> decision, collective and political actions of African American communities to implement the <em>Brown</em> decision, and varying perspectives within African American communities as well as Whites who opposed the <em>Brown</em> decision. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Studies Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.09.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Studies Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885985X2030053X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the ways in which secondary U.S. history teachers who attended two iterations of a teacher professional development workshop, focusing on the history of school desegregation in Virginia, planned to teach the history of school desegregation through historical inquiry. Conceptualizing the history of school desegregation as difficult history, the authors conducted the content analysis of 23 written lesson plans generated by workshop participants. The historiography of school desegregation, and research on four dimensions of historical inquiry such as Change and Continuity, Causation, Multiple Perspectives and Historical Sources, guided the data analysis. The findings suggest that teachers in this study were most likely to design their inquiry around Causation, framing the history of school desegregation within the classical timeline of the Civil Rights Movement, which begins with the Brown v. Board of Education decision (1954) and ends with the Civil Rights Act of 1968. What was often absent in these inquiries was Massive Resistance, the backlash against the Brown v. Board of Education decision, collective and political actions of African American communities to implement the Brown decision, and varying perspectives within African American communities as well as Whites who opposed the Brown decision. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划通过历史探究来教授困难的历史:学校废除种族隔离的案例
本探索性研究调查了参加两次教师专业发展研讨会的美国中学历史教师,他们计划通过历史探究来教授学校废除种族隔离的历史。该研讨会以弗吉尼亚州的学校废除种族隔离的历史为重点。作者将学校废除种族隔离的历史概念化为艰难的历史,对研讨会参与者生成的23份书面教案进行了内容分析。学校废除种族隔离的史学研究以及历史探究的四个维度(变化与延续、因果关系、多重视角和历史来源)的研究指导了数据分析。研究结果表明,本研究中的教师最有可能围绕因果关系来设计他们的调查,在民权运动的经典时间线中构建学校废除种族隔离的历史,从布朗诉教育委员会的决定(1954年)开始,到1968年的民权法案结束。在这些调查中经常缺少的是大规模抵抗,对布朗诉教育委员会决定的强烈反对,非裔美国人社区为执行布朗决定而采取的集体和政治行动,以及非裔美国人社区和反对布朗决定的白人的不同观点。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Studies Research
Journal of Social Studies Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Studies Research (JSSR) is an internationally recognized peer-reviewed journal designed to foster the dissemination of ideas and research findings related to the social studies. JSSR is the official publication of The International Society for the Social Studies (ISSS). JSSR is published four times per year (winter, spring, summer, & fall).
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of group investigation versus lecture-based instruction on students’ concept mastery and transfer in social studies Using eyewitnesses to promote students’ understanding of empathy in the history classroom Teach what you preach? The relationship between teachers’ citizenship beliefs and citizenship education in the classroom Troubling state (of) affairs: A critical analysis of a state-approved, elementary field trip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1