Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26

Q3 Social Sciences Carbon and Climate Law Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4
W. Obergassel, C. Arens, C. Beuermann, V. Brandemann, Lukas, Hermwille, Nicolas Kreibich, Hermann E. Ott, M. Spitzner
{"title":"Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26","authors":"W. Obergassel, C. Arens, C. Beuermann, V. Brandemann, Lukas, Hermwille, Nicolas Kreibich, Hermann E. Ott, M. Spitzner","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Glasgow climate conference marked a symbolic juncture, lying half-way between the adoption of the UNFCCC in 1992 and the year 2050 in which according to the IPCC special report on the 1.5°C limit net zero CO2 emissions need to be reached, globally, in order to maintain a good chance of achieving the 1.5°C limit. This article undertakes an assessment of what the UNFCCC and in particular the Paris Agreement and its implementation process have actually achieved so far up to and including the results of the Glasgow conference. The article discusses efforts at ambition raising both within and outside the formal diplomatic process, the finalization of the implementation rules of the Paris Agreement, as well as progress on gender responsiveness, climate finance, adaptation and loss and damage. In summary, the Paris Agreement and its implementation can be considered a success as it is having a discernible impact on the behavior of parties as well as on non-party actors. However, significant further efforts will be required to actually achieve the objectives of the Agreement.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Glasgow climate conference marked a symbolic juncture, lying half-way between the adoption of the UNFCCC in 1992 and the year 2050 in which according to the IPCC special report on the 1.5°C limit net zero CO2 emissions need to be reached, globally, in order to maintain a good chance of achieving the 1.5°C limit. This article undertakes an assessment of what the UNFCCC and in particular the Paris Agreement and its implementation process have actually achieved so far up to and including the results of the Glasgow conference. The article discusses efforts at ambition raising both within and outside the formal diplomatic process, the finalization of the implementation rules of the Paris Agreement, as well as progress on gender responsiveness, climate finance, adaptation and loss and damage. In summary, the Paris Agreement and its implementation can be considered a success as it is having a discernible impact on the behavior of parties as well as on non-party actors. However, significant further efforts will be required to actually achieve the objectives of the Agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转折点格拉斯哥?对COP26气候大会的评估
格拉斯哥气候会议标志着一个具有象征意义的关键时刻,它位于1992年通过《联合国气候变化框架公约》和2050年之间,根据IPCC关于1.5°C限制的特别报告,在2050年,全球需要达到净零二氧化碳排放,以保持实现1.5°C限制的良好机会。本文评估了《联合国气候变化框架公约》,特别是《巴黎协定》及其实施进程到目前为止所取得的实际成果,包括格拉斯哥会议的成果。本文讨论了在正式外交进程内外提高雄心的努力,《巴黎协定》实施规则的最终确定,以及在性别响应、气候融资、适应和损失与损害方面的进展。总之,《巴黎协定》及其实施可以被认为是成功的,因为它对缔约方和非缔约方行为体的行为产生了明显的影响。但是,要真正实现《协定》的各项目标,还需要作出重大的进一步努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
European Union ∙ European Climate Policy: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Reparations For Climate Harm and The Role of The Loss and Damage Mechanism: Lessons from Other Areas of Law Bringing the Ocean into National Systemic Climate Litigation – Is Due Diligence a Bridge? Regulatory Approaches to Carbon Dioxide Usage and Storage in the European Union Indonesia ∙ The Voluntary Carbon Market and Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1