Where's My Doctor? The Impact of the Primary Oncologist's Visit with Their Hospitalized Patients.

Brianna R Bakow, F. Schiffman, A. Mega
{"title":"Where's My Doctor? The Impact of the Primary Oncologist's Visit with Their Hospitalized Patients.","authors":"Brianna R Bakow, F. Schiffman, A. Mega","doi":"10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.6603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nContinuity of care is a cornerstone of the patient-practitioner relationship. Previously, patient satisfaction has been related to perceived provider communication skills and competence. Our study assessed the relationship between the inpatient continuity visit (ICV), a face-to-face patient-provider interaction with the primary oncologist, and patient satisfaction.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSubjects were adult inpatients on the oncology unit at The Miriam Hospital who had an oncologist at the hospital-based cancer center. A survey, given at discharge, included a 5-point Likert scale ranging from greatly worsened to greatly improved satisfaction to assess the impact of the ICV on patient satisfaction.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 75 participants, 43 (57.3%) reported a visit by their outpatient oncologist. Of these, 39 (90.7%) reported that this visit either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction with their hospital stay. Of subjects who had a single ICV, 93.7% reported either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction compared to 88.9% who had more than one visit. Of 32 (43.3%) subjects who did not receive a visit, 15.6% reported that the lack of visit either greatly or somewhat worsened their satisfaction during their hospital stay, while 84.4% reported no impact.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur study suggests that an ICV improves satisfaction of care in cancer patients on a hospitalist service, and a lack of ICV negatively impacted satisfaction. There was no improvement in satisfaction for multiple versus single ICVs. While the practicality of this intervention should be reassessed with the emergence of more accessible telehealth modalities, the efficacy of a single visit to improve satisfaction is informative.","PeriodicalId":21256,"journal":{"name":"Rhode Island medical journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"39-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhode Island medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.6603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Continuity of care is a cornerstone of the patient-practitioner relationship. Previously, patient satisfaction has been related to perceived provider communication skills and competence. Our study assessed the relationship between the inpatient continuity visit (ICV), a face-to-face patient-provider interaction with the primary oncologist, and patient satisfaction. METHODS Subjects were adult inpatients on the oncology unit at The Miriam Hospital who had an oncologist at the hospital-based cancer center. A survey, given at discharge, included a 5-point Likert scale ranging from greatly worsened to greatly improved satisfaction to assess the impact of the ICV on patient satisfaction. RESULTS Of 75 participants, 43 (57.3%) reported a visit by their outpatient oncologist. Of these, 39 (90.7%) reported that this visit either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction with their hospital stay. Of subjects who had a single ICV, 93.7% reported either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction compared to 88.9% who had more than one visit. Of 32 (43.3%) subjects who did not receive a visit, 15.6% reported that the lack of visit either greatly or somewhat worsened their satisfaction during their hospital stay, while 84.4% reported no impact. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that an ICV improves satisfaction of care in cancer patients on a hospitalist service, and a lack of ICV negatively impacted satisfaction. There was no improvement in satisfaction for multiple versus single ICVs. While the practicality of this intervention should be reassessed with the emergence of more accessible telehealth modalities, the efficacy of a single visit to improve satisfaction is informative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的医生在哪里?肿瘤主治医师访视对住院病人的影响。
背景护理的连续性是医患关系的基石。以前,患者满意度与感知到的提供者沟通技巧和能力有关。我们的研究评估了住院连续性访问(ICV),与原发肿瘤科医生面对面的患者-提供者互动,与患者满意度之间的关系。方法研究对象为Miriam医院肿瘤科的成年住院患者,他们在医院肿瘤中心有一名肿瘤科医生。出院时进行的一项调查,包括5分李克特量表,从严重恶化到极大改善满意度,以评估ICV对患者满意度的影响。结果75名参与者中,43名(57.3%)报告了门诊肿瘤科医生的访问。其中,39人(90.7%)报告说,这次访问大大或多少提高了他们的住院满意度。在接受过一次ICV的受试者中,93.7%的人表示满意度大大或有所提高,而接受过一次以上ICV的受试者满意度为88.9%。在32名(43.3%)未接受访问的受试者中,15.6%的人报告说,在住院期间,缺乏访问大大或多少降低了他们的满意度,而84.4%的人报告没有影响。结论我们的研究表明,ICV提高了癌症患者对医院服务的满意度,而缺乏ICV会对满意度产生负面影响。与单个体外循环器相比,多个体外循环器的满意度没有提高。虽然随着更容易获得的远程保健模式的出现,这种干预措施的实用性应得到重新评估,但单次就诊对提高满意度的效果是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Holding Hands. On Syndromes. Extraintestinal Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Tension Pneumocephalus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1