Pilot decision-making during a dual engine failure on take-off: Insights from three different decision-making models

Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1002/hfm.20944
Katie J. Parnell, Rachael A. Wynne, Katherine L. Plant, Victoria A. Banks, Thomas, G.C. Griffin, Neville A. Stanton
{"title":"Pilot decision-making during a dual engine failure on take-off: Insights from three different decision-making models","authors":"Katie J. Parnell,&nbsp;Rachael A. Wynne,&nbsp;Katherine L. Plant,&nbsp;Victoria A. Banks,&nbsp;Thomas, G.C. Griffin,&nbsp;Neville A. Stanton","doi":"10.1002/hfm.20944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Commercial airline pilots are required to make efficient, justifiable, and safety-critical decisions when faced with adverse events such as engine failures. Although these are rare events, the consequences are severe, and the pilot response is critical. This paper reviews pilot decision-making when faced with a dual engine failure on take-off using three different decision models; the Recognition Primed Decision Model, Decision Ladders and the Perceptual Cycle Model. In-depth interviews with eight experienced airline pilots were conducted to capture their decision-making processes in response to a dual engine failure on take-off event. The analysis of these interviews using the three different decision models provide recommendations for a proposed decision assistant. The different decision models are discussed in relation to the insight they can bring to developing a future decision assistant tool within the flight deck of commercial aircraft.</p>","PeriodicalId":73259,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"32 3","pages":"268-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.20944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Commercial airline pilots are required to make efficient, justifiable, and safety-critical decisions when faced with adverse events such as engine failures. Although these are rare events, the consequences are severe, and the pilot response is critical. This paper reviews pilot decision-making when faced with a dual engine failure on take-off using three different decision models; the Recognition Primed Decision Model, Decision Ladders and the Perceptual Cycle Model. In-depth interviews with eight experienced airline pilots were conducted to capture their decision-making processes in response to a dual engine failure on take-off event. The analysis of these interviews using the three different decision models provide recommendations for a proposed decision assistant. The different decision models are discussed in relation to the insight they can bring to developing a future decision assistant tool within the flight deck of commercial aircraft.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
起飞时双引擎故障时的飞行员决策:来自三种不同决策模型的见解
商业航空公司的飞行员被要求在面对诸如引擎故障之类的不利事件时做出有效、合理和安全关键的决定。虽然这些是罕见的事件,但后果是严重的,试点反应至关重要。本文用三种不同的决策模型回顾了飞行员在面对双引擎起飞故障时的决策;认知启动决策模型、决策阶梯和知觉循环模型。对8名经验丰富的航空公司飞行员进行了深入访谈,以捕捉他们在应对起飞时双引擎故障事件时的决策过程。使用三种不同的决策模型对这些访谈进行分析,为建议的决策助理提供建议。讨论了不同的决策模型,以及它们可以为开发商用飞机驾驶舱内的未来决策辅助工具带来的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1