Geometry factor for external detectors in fission track dating

A.J.W. Gleadow, J.F. Lovering
{"title":"Geometry factor for external detectors in fission track dating","authors":"A.J.W. Gleadow,&nbsp;J.F. Lovering","doi":"10.1016/0145-224X(77)90003-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Induced-fission track densities have been compared on mica external track detectors (2π geometry) and internal mineral surfaces (4π geometry) for the minerals apatite, zircon and sphene. The track-density ratios indicate that the geometry factor relating these two track-registration geometries is indistinguishable from the ideal value of 0·5 (i.e. 2π/4π) for these minerals. External track detectors are not geometrically equivalent to external etching surfaces of a uranium-bearing material. Values significantly higher than 0·5 are caused by a low etching efficiency on the internal mineral surface. The etching efficiency varies with crystallographic orientation in zircon, and may be lowered after thermal annealing in sphene. Etching a mineral surface for spontaneous tracks has no observable effect on the uranium concentration of that surface. These observations have important implications for the use of the external-detector method in fission-track dating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100974,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Track Detection","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0145-224X(77)90003-5","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Track Detection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145224X77900035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Induced-fission track densities have been compared on mica external track detectors (2π geometry) and internal mineral surfaces (4π geometry) for the minerals apatite, zircon and sphene. The track-density ratios indicate that the geometry factor relating these two track-registration geometries is indistinguishable from the ideal value of 0·5 (i.e. 2π/4π) for these minerals. External track detectors are not geometrically equivalent to external etching surfaces of a uranium-bearing material. Values significantly higher than 0·5 are caused by a low etching efficiency on the internal mineral surface. The etching efficiency varies with crystallographic orientation in zircon, and may be lowered after thermal annealing in sphene. Etching a mineral surface for spontaneous tracks has no observable effect on the uranium concentration of that surface. These observations have important implications for the use of the external-detector method in fission-track dating.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裂变径迹定年中外探测器的几何因子
在云母外径迹探测器(2π几何)和矿物内径迹探测器(4π几何)上对磷灰石、锆石和榍石进行了诱导裂变径迹密度的比较。径迹密度比表明,与这两种径迹配准几何形状相关的几何因子与这些矿物的理想值0.5(即2π/4π)难以区分。外部轨迹探测器在几何上不等同于含铀材料的外部蚀刻表面。数值显著高于0·5是由于矿物内部表面蚀刻效率低造成的。在锆石中,蚀刻效率随晶体取向的不同而变化,在榍石中进行热处理后,蚀刻效率可能降低。在矿物表面蚀刻自然轨迹对该表面的铀浓度没有可观察到的影响。这些观察结果对使用外部探测器方法进行裂变径迹定年具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor Erratum Announcement A multi-detector electrochemical etching and automatic scanning system Anisotropic track etching in olivine crystals using WN solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1