The Waste Land 100 Years On

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Secular Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1163/25892525-bja10034
J. Vanheste
{"title":"The Waste Land 100 Years On","authors":"J. Vanheste","doi":"10.1163/25892525-bja10034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the past century, there have been remarkable changes in the appreciation of T.S. Eliot (1888–1965). From the interwar years up to the 1950s, he was for decades an icon of high culture and outstanding moral values, of everything that is beautiful and good and deserves admiration; while from the 1970s onwards he became a symbol of a completely different kind: one of elitism and conservatism, of everything that is wrong and deserves condemnation. Over the past twenty years, gradually a more balanced view has been established. In this article I outline this development, relate it to general changes in the cultural climate, and argue that, a hundred years after publication of his major poem The Waste Land (1922), T.S. Eliot remains highly significant to us both as a poet and a cultural critic.","PeriodicalId":29677,"journal":{"name":"Secular Studies","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secular Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past century, there have been remarkable changes in the appreciation of T.S. Eliot (1888–1965). From the interwar years up to the 1950s, he was for decades an icon of high culture and outstanding moral values, of everything that is beautiful and good and deserves admiration; while from the 1970s onwards he became a symbol of a completely different kind: one of elitism and conservatism, of everything that is wrong and deserves condemnation. Over the past twenty years, gradually a more balanced view has been established. In this article I outline this development, relate it to general changes in the cultural climate, and argue that, a hundred years after publication of his major poem The Waste Land (1922), T.S. Eliot remains highly significant to us both as a poet and a cultural critic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
100年后的荒原
在过去的一个世纪里,人们对T.S.艾略特(1888-1965)的欣赏发生了显著的变化。从两次世界大战之间的年代到20世纪50年代,他几十年来一直是高雅文化和杰出道德价值观的象征,是一切美好、善良、值得钦佩的事物的象征;而从20世纪70年代开始,他成为了一种完全不同的象征:精英主义和保守主义的象征,一切错误的、应该受到谴责的象征。在过去的二十年里,逐渐建立了一种更加平衡的观点。在这篇文章中,我概述了这一发展,并将其与文化气候的总体变化联系起来,并认为,在他的主要诗歌《荒原》(1922年)发表100年后,T.S.艾略特作为诗人和文化评论家对我们仍然具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary on Urban Secularism by Julia Martínez-Ariño Revisiting Urban Secularism Preface to Special Section about Julia Martínez-Ariño’s Urban Secularism Why a Lack of Secularism Contributes to Underdevelopment in Many Muslim Countries Urban Secularism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1