Ideology in the Focus of Critical Discourse Analysis N. Fairclough

N. Chernysh, Tetyana Lukeria
{"title":"Ideology in the Focus of Critical Discourse Analysis N. Fairclough","authors":"N. Chernysh, Tetyana Lukeria","doi":"10.26565/2077-5105-2020-24-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper describes two basic principles of sociological analysis of ideology in the early XXI century: the principle of double contextualization of M. Burawoy and the principle of the duality of structures and subjects of P. Sztompka. This allowed to clarify the focus of the author's research on the intersection of the plurality of ideologies and multiparadigm of modern sociology. Authors have distinguished a sociological understanding of the transformations of the social role of ideology in the development of societies during the XIX – early XXI century and its three main phases. Taking into account the multiparadigm of ideology, the possibilities of its conceptualization in a number of major sociological metaparadigms and their axiomatic nuclei are analyzed. Paper emphasizes on diversifying the debate on the macro-micro dichotomy in the study of ideology by increasing the invariance in the interpretation of both members of this dichotomy and recognizing the complex nature of structures and subjects that have object-subject characteristics. There is a lack of sociological explication and conceptualization of such a vision of ideology and corresponding methods of empirical research. Therefore, the narrowing of sociological optics to the study of ideology within the socio-constructive direction of sociological theorizing in its critical version is argued. As the importance of studying the practical aspects of ideology and the role of its subjects in social transformations is emphasized today, the position of N. Fairclough was chosen as the main methodological source within the cluster of critical discourse analysis. Paper describes heuristic possibilities and limits of using the theoretical provisions of critical discourse-analysis of N. Fairclough for cognition of ideology. The main characteristics of ideological discourse are argued, as well as the main provisions of critical discourse-analysis are applied to the study of ideology with special attention to its subjects. As a result of the application of these research procedures, an approach to the conceptual scheme of ideology research is developed, which takes into account its object-subject characteristics and allows studying the role of agents and recipients in the construction and consumption of ideology, аs well as in the transformation of social practices and socio-cultural transformations.","PeriodicalId":62895,"journal":{"name":"科学24小时","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"科学24小时","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2020-24-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paper describes two basic principles of sociological analysis of ideology in the early XXI century: the principle of double contextualization of M. Burawoy and the principle of the duality of structures and subjects of P. Sztompka. This allowed to clarify the focus of the author's research on the intersection of the plurality of ideologies and multiparadigm of modern sociology. Authors have distinguished a sociological understanding of the transformations of the social role of ideology in the development of societies during the XIX – early XXI century and its three main phases. Taking into account the multiparadigm of ideology, the possibilities of its conceptualization in a number of major sociological metaparadigms and their axiomatic nuclei are analyzed. Paper emphasizes on diversifying the debate on the macro-micro dichotomy in the study of ideology by increasing the invariance in the interpretation of both members of this dichotomy and recognizing the complex nature of structures and subjects that have object-subject characteristics. There is a lack of sociological explication and conceptualization of such a vision of ideology and corresponding methods of empirical research. Therefore, the narrowing of sociological optics to the study of ideology within the socio-constructive direction of sociological theorizing in its critical version is argued. As the importance of studying the practical aspects of ideology and the role of its subjects in social transformations is emphasized today, the position of N. Fairclough was chosen as the main methodological source within the cluster of critical discourse analysis. Paper describes heuristic possibilities and limits of using the theoretical provisions of critical discourse-analysis of N. Fairclough for cognition of ideology. The main characteristics of ideological discourse are argued, as well as the main provisions of critical discourse-analysis are applied to the study of ideology with special attention to its subjects. As a result of the application of these research procedures, an approach to the conceptual scheme of ideology research is developed, which takes into account its object-subject characteristics and allows studying the role of agents and recipients in the construction and consumption of ideology, аs well as in the transformation of social practices and socio-cultural transformations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批评话语分析焦点中的意识形态
本文介绍了21世纪初意识形态社会学分析的两个基本原则:布拉维的双重语境化原则和什通普卡的结构与主体的二元性原则。这使得作者对现代社会学的意识形态多元性和多范式交叉的研究重点得以明确。作者区分了意识形态在十九世纪至二十一世纪早期社会发展中的社会角色转变的社会学理解及其三个主要阶段。考虑到意识形态的多范式,分析了其概念化在一些主要社会学元范式中的可能性及其公理化核心。本文强调在意识形态研究中,通过增加对宏观-微观二分法两个成员的解释的不变性,并认识到具有客体-主体特征的结构和主体的复杂性,使宏观-微观二分法的争论多样化。这种意识形态视野缺乏社会学的解释和概念化,也缺乏相应的实证研究方法。因此,本文认为,在社会学理论化的社会建构性方向下,社会学的视野应该缩小到意识形态的研究。由于研究意识形态的实践方面及其主体在社会转型中的作用的重要性在今天得到强调,费尔克劳的立场被选为批评话语分析集群中的主要方法论来源。本文描述了运用费尔克劳的批判话语分析理论来认识意识形态的启发式可能性和局限性。本文论述了意识形态话语的主要特征,并将批评性话语分析的主要内容应用于意识形态研究,特别关注意识形态研究的主体。由于这些研究程序的应用,一种意识形态研究的概念方案的方法被开发出来,它考虑到它的客体-主体特征,并允许研究主体和接受者在意识形态的建构和消费中的作用,以及在社会实践和社会文化转型中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6690
期刊最新文献
Meaning-making tools in intersemiotic translation (based on screen adaptation of “The hours”) Emergent meaning-making in multimodal discourse: A case for sadness in The Horse Whisperer Crossing the textual frame and its transmedial effects Professional wrestling and identity construction in the realm of social media Ukraine and the West in pro-Russia Chinese media: A methodology for the analysis of multimodal political narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1