Modeling remdesivir antiviral efficacy in COVID-19 hospitalized patients of the randomized, controlled, open-label DisCoVeRy trial

G. Lingas, N. Néant, A. Gaymard, D. Belhadi, G. Peytavin, M. Hites, T. Staub, R. Greil, J. Paiva, J. Poissy, N. Peiffer‐Smadja, D. Costagliola, Y. Yazdanpanah, F. Wallet, A. Gagneux-Brunon, F. Mentré, F. Ader, C. Burdet, J. Guedj, M. Bouscambert-Duchamp, DisCoVeRy study group
{"title":"Modeling remdesivir antiviral efficacy in COVID-19 hospitalized patients of the randomized, controlled, open-label DisCoVeRy trial","authors":"G. Lingas, N. Néant, A. Gaymard, D. Belhadi, G. Peytavin, M. Hites, T. Staub, R. Greil, J. Paiva, J. Poissy, N. Peiffer‐Smadja, D. Costagliola, Y. Yazdanpanah, F. Wallet, A. Gagneux-Brunon, F. Mentré, F. Ader, C. Burdet, J. Guedj, M. Bouscambert-Duchamp, DisCoVeRy study group","doi":"10.1101/2021.10.19.21265209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite several clinical studies, the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 hospitalized patients remains controversial. We analyzed nasopharyngeal normalized viral loads collected in the 29 days following randomization from 665 hospitalized patients included in the DisCoVeRy trial, allocated to either standard of care (SoC, N=329) or SoC + remdesivir for 10 days (N=336). We used a mathematical model to reconstruct viral kinetic profiles and estimate the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in reducing viral production. To identify factors associated with viral kinetics, additional analyses were conducted stratified either on time of treatment initiation ([≤] or > 7 days since symptom onset) or viral load at randomization (< or [≥] 3.5 log10 copies/104 cells). In our model, remdesivir reduced viral production by 2-fold on average (95%CI: 1.5-3.2). Using the estimated parameter of the model, simulations predict that remdesivir reduces time to viral clearance by 0.7 day compared to SoC, with large inter-individual variabilities (Inter-Quartile Range, IQR: 0.0-1.3 days). Exploratory analyses suggest that remdesivir had a larger impact in patients with a high viral load at randomization, reducing viral production by 5-fold on average (95%CI: 2.8-25), leading to a predicted median reduction in the time to viral clearance of 2.4 days (IQR: 0.9-4.5 days). In summary, our model shows that remdesivir reduces viral production from infected cells by a factor 2, leading to a median reduction of 0.7 days in the time to viral clearance compared to SoC. The efficacy was larger in patients with high level of viral load at treatment initiation.","PeriodicalId":38738,"journal":{"name":"Topics in antiviral medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in antiviral medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.19.21265209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite several clinical studies, the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 hospitalized patients remains controversial. We analyzed nasopharyngeal normalized viral loads collected in the 29 days following randomization from 665 hospitalized patients included in the DisCoVeRy trial, allocated to either standard of care (SoC, N=329) or SoC + remdesivir for 10 days (N=336). We used a mathematical model to reconstruct viral kinetic profiles and estimate the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in reducing viral production. To identify factors associated with viral kinetics, additional analyses were conducted stratified either on time of treatment initiation ([≤] or > 7 days since symptom onset) or viral load at randomization (< or [≥] 3.5 log10 copies/104 cells). In our model, remdesivir reduced viral production by 2-fold on average (95%CI: 1.5-3.2). Using the estimated parameter of the model, simulations predict that remdesivir reduces time to viral clearance by 0.7 day compared to SoC, with large inter-individual variabilities (Inter-Quartile Range, IQR: 0.0-1.3 days). Exploratory analyses suggest that remdesivir had a larger impact in patients with a high viral load at randomization, reducing viral production by 5-fold on average (95%CI: 2.8-25), leading to a predicted median reduction in the time to viral clearance of 2.4 days (IQR: 0.9-4.5 days). In summary, our model shows that remdesivir reduces viral production from infected cells by a factor 2, leading to a median reduction of 0.7 days in the time to viral clearance compared to SoC. The efficacy was larger in patients with high level of viral load at treatment initiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟瑞德西韦对COVID-19住院患者的随机、对照、开放标签DisCoVeRy试验的抗病毒疗效
尽管有几项临床研究,瑞德西韦对COVID-19住院患者的抗病毒疗效仍存在争议。我们分析了DisCoVeRy试验中随机分组后29天内收集的665名住院患者的鼻咽标准化病毒载量,这些患者被分配到标准治疗组(SoC, N=329)或SoC +瑞德西韦10天(N=336)。我们使用了一个数学模型来重建病毒动力学概况,并估计瑞德西韦在减少病毒产生方面的抗病毒功效。为了确定与病毒动力学相关的因素,对治疗开始时间(症状出现后[≤]或> 7天)或随机分组时的病毒载量(<或[≥]3.5 log10拷贝/104个细胞)进行了分层分析。在我们的模型中,瑞德西韦平均减少了2倍的病毒产生(95%CI: 1.5-3.2)。使用模型的估计参数,模拟预测,与SoC相比,remdesivir减少了0.7天的病毒清除时间,具有很大的个体间差异(四分位数范围,IQR: 0.0-1.3天)。探索性分析表明,在随机分组时,瑞德西韦对病毒载量高的患者有更大的影响,平均减少5倍的病毒产生(95%CI: 2.8-25),导致预测中位病毒清除时间减少2.4天(IQR: 0.9-4.5天)。总之,我们的模型显示,与SoC相比,remdesivir将感染细胞的病毒产生减少了2倍,导致病毒清除时间中位数减少0.7天。在治疗开始时病毒载量高的患者中,疗效更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in antiviral medicine
Topics in antiviral medicine Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
CROI 2024: Global Epidemiology and Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases. CROI 2024: Metabolic and Other Complications of HIV Infection. CROI 2024: Summary of Basic Science Research in HIV. CROI 2024: Tuberculosis, Mpox, and Other Infectious Complications in People With HIV. Long-Term Effects of COVID-19: The Stories of 2 Physicians Who Became Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1