Which Contributions Predict Whether Developers are Accepted into GitHub Teams

Justin Middleton, E. Murphy-Hill, Demetrius Green, A. Meade, R. Mayer, D. White, Steve McDonald
{"title":"Which Contributions Predict Whether Developers are Accepted into GitHub Teams","authors":"Justin Middleton, E. Murphy-Hill, Demetrius Green, A. Meade, R. Mayer, D. White, Steve McDonald","doi":"10.1145/3196398.3196429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open-source software (OSS) often evolves from volunteer contributions, so OSS development teams must cooperate with their communities to attract new developers. However, in view of the myriad ways that developers interact over platforms for OSS development, observers of these communities may have trouble discerning, and thus learning from, the successful patterns of developer-to-team interactions that lead to eventual team acceptance. In this work, we study project communities on GitHub to discover which forms of software contribution characterize developers who begin as development team outsiders and eventually join the team, in contrast to developers who remain team outsiders. From this, we identify and compare the forms of contribution, such as pull requests and several forms of discussion comments, that influence whether new developers join OSS teams, and we discuss the implications that these behavioral patterns have for the focus of designers and educators.","PeriodicalId":6639,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"36 1","pages":"403-413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3196398.3196429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Open-source software (OSS) often evolves from volunteer contributions, so OSS development teams must cooperate with their communities to attract new developers. However, in view of the myriad ways that developers interact over platforms for OSS development, observers of these communities may have trouble discerning, and thus learning from, the successful patterns of developer-to-team interactions that lead to eventual team acceptance. In this work, we study project communities on GitHub to discover which forms of software contribution characterize developers who begin as development team outsiders and eventually join the team, in contrast to developers who remain team outsiders. From this, we identify and compare the forms of contribution, such as pull requests and several forms of discussion comments, that influence whether new developers join OSS teams, and we discuss the implications that these behavioral patterns have for the focus of designers and educators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些贡献预测开发人员是否被GitHub团队接受
开源软件(OSS)通常是从志愿者贡献中发展而来的,因此OSS开发团队必须与他们的社区合作以吸引新的开发人员。然而,考虑到开发人员在OSS开发平台上进行交互的无数种方式,这些社区的观察者可能很难辨别并从中学习开发人员到团队交互的成功模式,从而导致最终的团队接受。在这项工作中,我们研究了GitHub上的项目社区,以发现哪些形式的软件贡献特征是开发人员从开发团队外部开始,最终加入团队,与团队外部的开发人员形成对比。从这里,我们确定并比较贡献的形式,例如拉请求和几种形式的讨论评论,它们会影响新开发人员是否加入OSS团队,我们还讨论了这些行为模式对设计师和教育者关注的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting and Characterizing Developer Behavior Following Opportunistic Reuse of Code Snippets from the Web The Open-Closed Principle of Modern Machine Learning Frameworks Prevalence of Confusing Code in Software Projects: Atoms of Confusion in the Wild Large-Scale Analysis of the Co-commit Patterns of the Active Developers in GitHub's Top Repositories Structured Information on State and Evolution of Dockerfiles on GitHub
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1