Identification and assessment contexts of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners of Standard Australian English: Challenges for the language testing community

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Assessment Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.58379/xany2922
Denise Angelo
{"title":"Identification and assessment contexts of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners of Standard Australian English: Challenges for the language testing community","authors":"Denise Angelo","doi":"10.58379/xany2922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the contexts of language backgrounds, language learning, policy and assessment relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) students who are learning Standard Australian English (SAE) as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) in the state of Queensland. Complexities surrounding this cohort’s language situations and their language learning are explained in order to reveal why existing processes are not reliably identifying nor assessing those Indigenous students who are indeed EAL/D learners. In particular, it is argued, EAL/D processes and assessment instruments need to acknowledge and respond to the challenges posed by the rich and varied Indigenous language ecologies generated through language contact. System-level data does not disaggregate Indigenous EAL/D learners, nor correlate their levels of second language SAE proficiency with their academic performance data. Indigenous students are, however, over-represented in Queensland’s National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) under-performance data and raising their performance is a national priority and targeted through many government initiatives. Indigenous students comprise a highly heterogeneous group in terms of their cultural, linguistic and schooling backgrounds, and Indigenous EAL/D learners, too, represent a diverse grouping which has only been included relatively recently in Australian second language assessment tools, and around which there has been little extensive discussion, despite significant complexity surrounding this cohort. This paper explores the background contextual issues involved in identifying and assessing Indigenous EAL/D learners equitably and reliably.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/xany2922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The paper discusses the contexts of language backgrounds, language learning, policy and assessment relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) students who are learning Standard Australian English (SAE) as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) in the state of Queensland. Complexities surrounding this cohort’s language situations and their language learning are explained in order to reveal why existing processes are not reliably identifying nor assessing those Indigenous students who are indeed EAL/D learners. In particular, it is argued, EAL/D processes and assessment instruments need to acknowledge and respond to the challenges posed by the rich and varied Indigenous language ecologies generated through language contact. System-level data does not disaggregate Indigenous EAL/D learners, nor correlate their levels of second language SAE proficiency with their academic performance data. Indigenous students are, however, over-represented in Queensland’s National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) under-performance data and raising their performance is a national priority and targeted through many government initiatives. Indigenous students comprise a highly heterogeneous group in terms of their cultural, linguistic and schooling backgrounds, and Indigenous EAL/D learners, too, represent a diverse grouping which has only been included relatively recently in Australian second language assessment tools, and around which there has been little extensive discussion, despite significant complexity surrounding this cohort. This paper explores the background contextual issues involved in identifying and assessing Indigenous EAL/D learners equitably and reliably.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民标准澳大利亚英语学习者的识别和评估语境:语言测试社区面临的挑战
本文讨论了在昆士兰州学习标准澳大利亚英语(SAE)作为附加语言或方言(EAL/D)的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民(土著)学生的语言背景,语言学习,政策和评估的背景。为了揭示为什么现有的流程不能可靠地识别和评估那些确实是EAL/D学习者的土著学生,本文解释了这一群体的语言情况及其语言学习的复杂性。特别是,EAL/D过程和评估工具需要承认和应对语言接触产生的丰富多样的土著语言生态所带来的挑战。系统级数据不能分解本土EAL/D学习者,也不能将他们的第二语言SAE熟练程度与他们的学习成绩数据联系起来。然而,在昆士兰州的国家评估计划中,土著学生的比例过高——读写和计算能力(NAPLAN)表现不佳的数据,提高他们的表现是国家的优先事项,也是许多政府举措的目标。就文化、语言和学校背景而言,土著学生构成了一个高度异质的群体,土著EAL/D学习者也代表了一个多元化的群体,这一群体直到最近才被纳入澳大利亚第二语言评估工具,尽管这一群体非常复杂,但围绕这一群体的广泛讨论却很少。本文探讨了公平可靠地识别和评估土著EAL/D学习者所涉及的背景背景问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contextual variables in written assessment feedback in a university-level Spanish program The effect of in-class and one-on-one video feedback on EFL learners’ English public speaking competency and anxiety Gebril, A. (Ed.) Learning-Oriented Language Assessment: Putting Theory into Practice. Is the devil you know better? Testwiseness and eliciting evidence of interactional competence in familiar versus unfamiliar triadic speaking tasks The meaningfulness of two curriculum-based national tests of English as a foreign language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1