Assessing Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Data in Biomedical Studies Using Descriptive Statistics and Standardized Mean Difference

A. A. Glazkov, D. Kulikov, P. Glazkova
{"title":"Assessing Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Data in Biomedical Studies Using Descriptive Statistics and Standardized Mean Difference","authors":"A. A. Glazkov, D. Kulikov, P. Glazkova","doi":"10.17537/2020.15.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nROC analysis is the most used method for analyzing the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative data in biomedical research. ROC analysis generates a curve describing the frequencies of true positive and false positive results for different degrees of the analyzed variable. However, in many publications devoted to the application of quantitative diagnostic methods, this analysis is not carried out: researchers report only analysis of statistical significance for the groups difference. In meta-analyses, the estimated parameter is the effect size expressed through standardized mean difference. The article describes the approach, which allows performing ROC analysis using cumulative normal distribution functions for studied and controlling groups. The proposed approach can be used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative variables on the base of one of the sets of descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation, or median and quartiles) or the value of standardized mean difference. Examples of application of the proposed approach on model data, on data from literature sources, as well as on the authors' own observations are given as an example of assessment of diagnostic accuracy of quantitative variables analyzed in the microcirculation studies in various diseases. The results presented in the article can be used by medical and biological specialists to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various quantitative variables without access to primary data.\n","PeriodicalId":53525,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17537/2020.15.416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ROC analysis is the most used method for analyzing the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative data in biomedical research. ROC analysis generates a curve describing the frequencies of true positive and false positive results for different degrees of the analyzed variable. However, in many publications devoted to the application of quantitative diagnostic methods, this analysis is not carried out: researchers report only analysis of statistical significance for the groups difference. In meta-analyses, the estimated parameter is the effect size expressed through standardized mean difference. The article describes the approach, which allows performing ROC analysis using cumulative normal distribution functions for studied and controlling groups. The proposed approach can be used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative variables on the base of one of the sets of descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation, or median and quartiles) or the value of standardized mean difference. Examples of application of the proposed approach on model data, on data from literature sources, as well as on the authors' own observations are given as an example of assessment of diagnostic accuracy of quantitative variables analyzed in the microcirculation studies in various diseases. The results presented in the article can be used by medical and biological specialists to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various quantitative variables without access to primary data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用描述性统计和标准化平均差评估生物医学研究中定量数据的诊断准确性
ROC分析是生物医学研究中最常用的定量数据诊断准确性分析方法。ROC分析生成一条曲线,描述被分析变量的不同程度的真阳性和假阳性结果的频率。然而,在许多致力于定量诊断方法应用的出版物中,没有进行这种分析:研究人员只报告了组间差异的统计显著性分析。在meta分析中,估计参数是通过标准化平均差表示的效应大小。本文描述了该方法,该方法允许对研究组和对照组使用累积正态分布函数进行ROC分析。所提出的方法可用于评估定量变量的诊断准确性基于一组描述性统计(均值和标准差,或中位数和四分位数)或标准化平均差值。所提出的方法应用于模型数据、文献资料以及作者自己的观察的例子,作为评估各种疾病的微循环研究中所分析的定量变量的诊断准确性的一个例子。医学和生物学专家可以使用文章中提出的结果来评估各种定量变量的诊断准确性,而无需获得原始数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics
Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Modeling Growth and Photoadaptation of Porphyridium purpureum Batch Culture Mathematical Modeling of the Initial Period of Spread of HIV-1 Infection in the Lymphatic Node Mathematical Model of Closed Microecosystem “Algae – Heterotrophic Bacteria” Using a Drug Repurposing Strategy to Virtually Screen Potential HIV-1 Entry Inhibitors That Block the NHR Domain of the Viral Envelope Protein gp41 Applying Laplace Transformation on Epidemiological Models as Caputo Derivatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1