Aristotelian and/or Nietzschean narratology

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Frontiers of Narrative Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1515/fns-2021-0004
Antonino Sorci
{"title":"Aristotelian and/or Nietzschean narratology","authors":"Antonino Sorci","doi":"10.1515/fns-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over the years, narratologists have established a unitary view of narrative structure based on the principles of Aristotle’s Poetics. I propose in this essay to describe the general features of an alternative epistemological framework based on a renewed interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy. Through this analysis, I wish to show how the adoption of the Aristotelian model as a framework for narratological research could have led to neglecting certain fundamental aspects of narrativity that the adoption of a Nietzschean perspective, conversely, would highlight. In particular, I want to emphasize that the abandonment of the Aristotelian perspective in favor of a Nietzschean approach can be extremely useful in order to highlight the über-natural character of so-called “unnatural narratives”. I will test my hypotheses through the analysis of David Foster Wallace’s short story “Mister Squishy” (2004), which represents an emblematic case of “Nietzschean narrative”.","PeriodicalId":29849,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"62 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2021-0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Over the years, narratologists have established a unitary view of narrative structure based on the principles of Aristotle’s Poetics. I propose in this essay to describe the general features of an alternative epistemological framework based on a renewed interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy. Through this analysis, I wish to show how the adoption of the Aristotelian model as a framework for narratological research could have led to neglecting certain fundamental aspects of narrativity that the adoption of a Nietzschean perspective, conversely, would highlight. In particular, I want to emphasize that the abandonment of the Aristotelian perspective in favor of a Nietzschean approach can be extremely useful in order to highlight the über-natural character of so-called “unnatural narratives”. I will test my hypotheses through the analysis of David Foster Wallace’s short story “Mister Squishy” (2004), which represents an emblematic case of “Nietzschean narrative”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德和尼采的叙事学
多年来,叙事学家在亚里士多德《诗学》原则的基础上建立了统一的叙事结构观。在这篇文章中,我建议描述一个基于对弗里德里希·尼采的《悲剧的诞生》的重新解释的认识论框架的一般特征。通过这个分析,我希望展示,采用亚里士多德模型作为叙事学研究的框架,是如何导致忽视叙事学的某些基本方面的,相反,采用尼采的观点会强调这些基本方面。特别地,我想强调的是,放弃亚里士多德的观点,支持尼采的方法,对于强调所谓的“非自然叙事”的自然特征,是非常有用的。我将通过分析大卫·福斯特·华莱士的短篇小说《软绵绵先生》(2004)来检验我的假设,这部小说代表了“尼采式叙事”的典型案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
“Old things made new”: Transfusive rejuvenescence in M. E. Braddon’s “Good Lady Ducayne” and H. G. Wells’s “The Story of the Late Mr. Elvesham” Unresolved conflicts and suspended ethics: Reading “The Monster” from the perspective of voice Introduction: Narratives of ageing in the fantastic mode “Inside many of us / is a small old man” – age/ing in Anne Sexton’s Transformations: A community discussion Éilís Ní Dhuibhne’s Little Red and Other Stories and gerotranscendence on the page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1