Metabolic Signature on 18F-FDG PET/CT, HER2 Status, and Survival in Gastric Adenocarcinomas

R. Celli, M. Colunga, N. Patel, M. Djekidel, D. Jain
{"title":"Metabolic Signature on 18F-FDG PET/CT, HER2 Status, and Survival in Gastric Adenocarcinomas","authors":"R. Celli, M. Colunga, N. Patel, M. Djekidel, D. Jain","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.116.181479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)–overexpressing (HER2-positive [HER2+]) gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GEJC) are felt to represent a more aggressive form of disease, which may correlate to increased metabolic activity. Whether tumor SUVmax measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a preoperative parameter used to predict HER2 status of GC/GEJC is unknown. Methods: Pathology reports of HER2+ GC/GEJC biopsies and resections from 31 patients were reviewed and compared with HER2-negative (HER2−) cases distributed evenly over the same time period. We analyzed their SUVmax intensity and then compared the HER2 status and SUVmax parameters and their association with survival. Results: After matching for age and sex, there was no difference in SUVmax between HER2+ and HER2− cases (9.7 and 8.4, respectively; P = 0.6). No difference was seen between HER2+ and HER2− cases in tumor histology (81% and 57% intestinal type, respectively; P = 0.11), size (2.6 and 3.8 cm, respectively; P = 0.12), differentiation (47% and 68% poorly differentiated, respectively; P = 0.06), or presence of lymph node metastasis (60% and 40%, respectively; P = 0.3). Although there was no difference in survival demonstrated by HER2+ and HER2− cases, there was a significant difference in survival between SUVmax above (12.2 mo) and below (30 mo) the median SUVmax (6.6, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study shows that SUVmax is not associated with HER2 status of GC/GEJC. Independent of HER2 overexpression, patients with a high SUVmax demonstrate a worse overall survival, suggesting that metabolic signature is a better predictor of biologic tumor aggressiveness than its histologic signature.","PeriodicalId":22799,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"234 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.181479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)–overexpressing (HER2-positive [HER2+]) gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GEJC) are felt to represent a more aggressive form of disease, which may correlate to increased metabolic activity. Whether tumor SUVmax measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a preoperative parameter used to predict HER2 status of GC/GEJC is unknown. Methods: Pathology reports of HER2+ GC/GEJC biopsies and resections from 31 patients were reviewed and compared with HER2-negative (HER2−) cases distributed evenly over the same time period. We analyzed their SUVmax intensity and then compared the HER2 status and SUVmax parameters and their association with survival. Results: After matching for age and sex, there was no difference in SUVmax between HER2+ and HER2− cases (9.7 and 8.4, respectively; P = 0.6). No difference was seen between HER2+ and HER2− cases in tumor histology (81% and 57% intestinal type, respectively; P = 0.11), size (2.6 and 3.8 cm, respectively; P = 0.12), differentiation (47% and 68% poorly differentiated, respectively; P = 0.06), or presence of lymph node metastasis (60% and 40%, respectively; P = 0.3). Although there was no difference in survival demonstrated by HER2+ and HER2− cases, there was a significant difference in survival between SUVmax above (12.2 mo) and below (30 mo) the median SUVmax (6.6, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study shows that SUVmax is not associated with HER2 status of GC/GEJC. Independent of HER2 overexpression, patients with a high SUVmax demonstrate a worse overall survival, suggesting that metabolic signature is a better predictor of biologic tumor aggressiveness than its histologic signature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征、HER2状态和胃腺癌患者的生存
人表皮生长因子2 (HER2)过表达(HER2阳性[HER2+])的胃(GC)和胃食管交界处腺癌(GEJC)被认为是一种更具侵袭性的疾病,可能与代谢活性增加有关。18F-FDG PET/CT测量的肿瘤SUVmax是否可以作为预测GC/GEJC HER2状态的术前参数尚不清楚。方法:回顾31例患者的HER2+ GC/GEJC活检和切除术的病理报告,并与同期均匀分布的HER2阴性(HER2−)病例进行比较。我们分析了他们的SUVmax强度,然后比较了HER2状态和SUVmax参数及其与生存的关系。结果:在匹配年龄和性别后,HER2+和HER2 -病例的SUVmax无差异(分别为9.7和8.4;P = 0.6)。HER2+和HER2−病例在肿瘤组织学上无差异(肠道型分别为81%和57%;P = 0.11),尺寸(分别为2.6和3.8 cm;P = 0.12),分化(低分化分别为47%和68%;P = 0.06),或存在淋巴结转移(分别为60%和40%;P = 0.3)。虽然HER2+和HER2−病例的生存期没有差异,但SUVmax高于(12.2个月)和低于(30个月)中位SUVmax之间的生存期存在显著差异(6.6,P = 0.01)。结论:我们的研究表明SUVmax与GC/GEJC的HER2状态无关。独立于HER2过表达,SUVmax高的患者表现出更差的总生存期,这表明代谢特征比其组织学特征更能预测肿瘤的生物侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Stability Matters: Radiochemical Stability of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-PSMA I&T Small-Bowel and Colon Transit SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicated γ-Cameras SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists: Clinical Research Primer—Regulatory Process, Part II: The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Food and Drug Administration–Regulated Radiopharmaceutical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1