Model-independent Evidence for an Increase in the Mean Mass of Cosmic Rays above 3 EeV

A. Watson
{"title":"Model-independent Evidence for an Increase in the Mean Mass of Cosmic Rays above 3 EeV","authors":"A. Watson","doi":"10.1051/epjconf/202328302014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurements of the Elongation Rate of the depth of shower maximum above 1 EeV are reviewed. There is evidence, from four independent estimates of this rate, made in the two hemispheres using three different techniques, for a decrease in the Elongation Rate above ~3 EeV, as first discovered by the Pierre Auger Collaboration over 15 year ago. Unless there is a dramatic change in the hadronic physics above this energy, the mean mass of the primary cosmic rays must increase as a function of energy, well into the decade beyond 10 EeV. To estimate the mass, the use of hadronic models is required, the accuracy of which remains uncertain. However, the possibility of a dramatic change in the hadronic physics appears unlikely, and would be inconsistent with data from the Auger Collaboration on the mass composition in the range 3 to 10 EeV, and on the anisotropy of arrival directions above 8 EeV. Both of these conclusions are insensitive to uncertainties in the shower models. Some remarks are made about the belief, still firmly held by some, that the highest-energy cosmic rays are dominantly protons.","PeriodicalId":11731,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Web of Conferences","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Web of Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328302014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Measurements of the Elongation Rate of the depth of shower maximum above 1 EeV are reviewed. There is evidence, from four independent estimates of this rate, made in the two hemispheres using three different techniques, for a decrease in the Elongation Rate above ~3 EeV, as first discovered by the Pierre Auger Collaboration over 15 year ago. Unless there is a dramatic change in the hadronic physics above this energy, the mean mass of the primary cosmic rays must increase as a function of energy, well into the decade beyond 10 EeV. To estimate the mass, the use of hadronic models is required, the accuracy of which remains uncertain. However, the possibility of a dramatic change in the hadronic physics appears unlikely, and would be inconsistent with data from the Auger Collaboration on the mass composition in the range 3 to 10 EeV, and on the anisotropy of arrival directions above 8 EeV. Both of these conclusions are insensitive to uncertainties in the shower models. Some remarks are made about the belief, still firmly held by some, that the highest-energy cosmic rays are dominantly protons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3 EeV以上宇宙射线平均质量增加的独立于模型的证据
综述了1 EeV以上最大淋浴深度伸长率的测量方法。有证据表明,在两个半球使用三种不同的技术对这一速率进行了四次独立估计,延伸率在~3 EeV以上下降,这是皮埃尔·奥格(Pierre Auger)在15年前首次发现的。除非在这个能量以上的强子物理中有一个巨大的变化,否则初级宇宙射线的平均质量作为能量的函数必须增加,直到超过10 EeV的十年。为了估计质量,需要使用强子模型,其准确性仍不确定。然而,强子物理发生剧烈变化的可能性似乎不太可能,并且与俄格合作在3至10 EeV范围内的质量组成和8 EeV以上到达方向的各向异性数据不一致。这两个结论对星雨模型的不确定性不敏感。一些人仍然坚定地相信,最高能量的宇宙射线主要是质子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heavy flavor and quarkonia results from the PHENIX experiment The ups and downs of inferred cosmological lithium Repurposing of the Run 2 CMS High Level Trigger Infrastructure as a Cloud Resource for Offline Computing HPC resources for CMS offline computing: An integration and scalability challenge for the Submission Infrastructure Adoption of a token-based authentication model for the CMS Submission Infrastructure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1