Intake, digestibility, and ingestive behavior of sheep fed with thornless Mandacaru, cactus pear genotypes Orelha de Elefante Mexicana and Miúda

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58162
Maria Gabriela da Trindade Silva, E. M. Aguiar, José Geraldo Medeiros da Silva, A. A. S. Melo, D. B. Cardoso, M. Costa, José Hamilton da Costa Filho, Adriana Margarida Zanbotto Ramalho
{"title":"Intake, digestibility, and ingestive behavior of sheep fed with thornless Mandacaru, cactus pear genotypes Orelha de Elefante Mexicana and Miúda","authors":"Maria Gabriela da Trindade Silva, E. M. Aguiar, José Geraldo Medeiros da Silva, A. A. S. Melo, D. B. Cardoso, M. Costa, José Hamilton da Costa Filho, Adriana Margarida Zanbotto Ramalho","doi":"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the intake, digestibility, and ingestive behavior of sheep fed with different species of forage cacti. Fifteen sheep (17.27kg ± 1 kg) were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with three treatments and five replicates. The treatments were diets on a dry matter basis composed of 430.9 g kg-1 of thornless Mandacaru cactus (Cereus hildmannianus), 525.7 g kg-1 of cactus pear cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (Opuntia stricta) and 492.1 g kg-1 of cactus pear cv. Miúda (Nopalea cochenillifera) in addition to Sabiá hay (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia) (194.7 to 233.8 g kg-1), plus concentrate feed. The intake of the dry matter, organic matter, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, total carbohydrates, non-fiber carbohydrates, total digestible nutrients and voluntary water intake in g day-1 was not differ (p > 0.05) by experimental diets. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in digestibility coefficients of the dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, total carbohydrates, non-fiber carbohydrates, and total digestible nutrients between the experimental diets. The feeding times differed (p < 0.05) between diets, with a higher value for the Opuntia diet, while the rumination times, feeding efficiency, and rumination efficiency did not differ (p > 0.05). The cactus Cereus and Opuntia and Nopalea have similar nutritional value in sheep’s diet.","PeriodicalId":7149,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the intake, digestibility, and ingestive behavior of sheep fed with different species of forage cacti. Fifteen sheep (17.27kg ± 1 kg) were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with three treatments and five replicates. The treatments were diets on a dry matter basis composed of 430.9 g kg-1 of thornless Mandacaru cactus (Cereus hildmannianus), 525.7 g kg-1 of cactus pear cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (Opuntia stricta) and 492.1 g kg-1 of cactus pear cv. Miúda (Nopalea cochenillifera) in addition to Sabiá hay (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia) (194.7 to 233.8 g kg-1), plus concentrate feed. The intake of the dry matter, organic matter, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, total carbohydrates, non-fiber carbohydrates, total digestible nutrients and voluntary water intake in g day-1 was not differ (p > 0.05) by experimental diets. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in digestibility coefficients of the dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, total carbohydrates, non-fiber carbohydrates, and total digestible nutrients between the experimental diets. The feeding times differed (p < 0.05) between diets, with a higher value for the Opuntia diet, while the rumination times, feeding efficiency, and rumination efficiency did not differ (p > 0.05). The cactus Cereus and Opuntia and Nopalea have similar nutritional value in sheep’s diet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无刺曼达卡鲁、仙人掌梨基因型Orelha de Elefante Mexicana和Miúda饲喂绵羊的采食量、消化率和摄食行为
本研究旨在评价绵羊对不同种类牧草仙人掌的采食量、消化率和摄食行为。试验选用15只羊(体重17.27kg±1 kg),采用完全随机设计,3个处理,5个重复。以干物质为基础,分别添加无刺仙人掌430.9 g kg-1和仙人掌梨525.7 g kg-1。墨西哥仙人掌(Opuntia stricta)和仙人掌梨品种492.1 g kg-1。Miúda (Nopalea cochenillifera)和sabi干草(Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia)(194.7至233.8 g kg-1),外加精料饲料。试验饲粮的干物质、有机物、粗脂肪、中性洗涤纤维、总碳水化合物、非纤维碳水化合物、总可消化营养物质和自愿水分采食量在g d -1无显著差异(p > 0.05)。各试验饲粮的干物质、有机物、中性洗涤纤维、总碳水化合物、非纤维碳水化合物和总可消化营养物质的消化系数均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。不同饲粮的采食次数差异显著(p < 0.05), Opuntia饲粮的采食次数较高,反刍次数、采食效率和反刍效率无显著差异(p > 0.05)。仙人掌、仙人掌、仙人掌在绵羊饲粮中具有相似的营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidence of leptospirosis in non-human primates at the santarém zoo, Pará, Brazil Assessment of dairy cows comfort in Algerian farms by the Welfare Quality® Protocol Biological performance and carcass yield of yearling Gumuz sheep under graded level concentrate supplementation in Ethiopia Levels of organochlorine contaminants in natural bovine milk marketed in Mojuí dos Campos and Belterra, Brazil Thermal comfort and productive responses of 7/8 holstein-gyr cows subjected to cooling system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1