A grid convergence index study of mesh style effect on the accuracy of the numerical results for an indoor airflow profile

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Ventilation Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/14733315.2019.1667558
N. Baker, G. Kelly, Paul D. O'Sullivan
{"title":"A grid convergence index study of mesh style effect on the accuracy of the numerical results for an indoor airflow profile","authors":"N. Baker, G. Kelly, Paul D. O'Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/14733315.2019.1667558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Grid Convergence Index () method requires at least three systematic mesh refinements, each requiring the numerical solution to be in the asymptotic range. When the observed order of accuracy differs from the formal order of accuracy, a lack of numerical precision exists which may result in erroneous conclusions. The aim of the work in this paper is to evaluate the effect the mesh resolution for structured hexahedral, unstructured hexahedral and tetrahedral mesh has on the observed order of accuracy and the accuracy of the numerical solution of the mean air flow velocity profile in indoor environments. The value was calculated based on the recommendation of the lower limit of the observed order of accuracy. For the structured hexahedral mesh, with successive grid refinements the observed order of accuracy converges close to the formal order of accuracy, while for the two other unstructured meshes it converges more gradually. The lowest value was obtained when the observed order of accuracy has reached its highest level of accuracy. In this study the turbulence model was adopted, and when the obtained numerical results were compared with another published numerical study, the comparison showed that the structured hexahedral mesh with turbulence model produced a similar result to that produced from unstructured hexahedral mesh using the turbulence model.","PeriodicalId":55613,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ventilation","volume":"4 1","pages":"300 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2019.1667558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Abstract The Grid Convergence Index () method requires at least three systematic mesh refinements, each requiring the numerical solution to be in the asymptotic range. When the observed order of accuracy differs from the formal order of accuracy, a lack of numerical precision exists which may result in erroneous conclusions. The aim of the work in this paper is to evaluate the effect the mesh resolution for structured hexahedral, unstructured hexahedral and tetrahedral mesh has on the observed order of accuracy and the accuracy of the numerical solution of the mean air flow velocity profile in indoor environments. The value was calculated based on the recommendation of the lower limit of the observed order of accuracy. For the structured hexahedral mesh, with successive grid refinements the observed order of accuracy converges close to the formal order of accuracy, while for the two other unstructured meshes it converges more gradually. The lowest value was obtained when the observed order of accuracy has reached its highest level of accuracy. In this study the turbulence model was adopted, and when the obtained numerical results were compared with another published numerical study, the comparison showed that the structured hexahedral mesh with turbulence model produced a similar result to that produced from unstructured hexahedral mesh using the turbulence model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网格形式对室内气流剖面数值结果精度影响的网格收敛指数研究
网格收敛指数()方法需要至少三次系统网格细化,每一次都要求数值解在渐近范围内。当观测到的精度顺序与形式精度顺序不同时,存在数值精度的缺乏,这可能导致错误的结论。本文的目的是评价结构六面体、非结构六面体和四面体网格的网格分辨率对室内环境平均气流速度剖面的观测精度和数值解精度的影响。该值是根据观察到的精度顺序的下限的建议计算的。对于结构化六面体网格,随着网格的不断细化,观测到的精度顺序收敛到接近形式精度顺序,而对于另外两种非结构化网格,观测到的精度顺序收敛得更为缓慢。当观测到的精度顺序达到其最高精度水平时,获得最低值。本研究采用湍流模型,将得到的数值结果与另一篇已发表的数值研究进行比较,结果表明,采用湍流模型的结构化六面体网格与采用湍流模型的非结构化六面体网格得到的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Ventilation
International Journal of Ventilation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is a peer reviewed journal aimed at providing the latest information on research and application. Topics include: • New ideas concerned with the development or application of ventilation; • Validated case studies demonstrating the performance of ventilation strategies; • Information on needs and solutions for specific building types including: offices, dwellings, schools, hospitals, parking garages, urban buildings and recreational buildings etc; • Developments in numerical methods; • Measurement techniques; • Related issues in which the impact of ventilation plays an important role (e.g. the interaction of ventilation with air quality, health and comfort); • Energy issues related to ventilation (e.g. low energy systems, ventilation heating and cooling loss); • Driving forces (weather data, fan performance etc).
期刊最新文献
Assessing thermal resilience to overheating in a Belgian apartment: impact of building parameters Passive ventilation for building not subjected to solar radiation Experimental study on the periodic pulsating ventilation by fluidic oscillator on pollutant dispersion and ventilation performance in enclosed environment Compartmentalization and ventilation system impacts on air and contaminant transport for multifamily buildings Controllable baffle-type exhaust-hood in home kitchen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1