Structural relationship in transtheoretical model of behavioural change constructs among students at a Malaysian university campus

Kien Ting Liu , Yee Cheng Kueh , YoungHo Kim , Garry Kuan
{"title":"Structural relationship in transtheoretical model of behavioural change constructs among students at a Malaysian university campus","authors":"Kien Ting Liu ,&nbsp;Yee Cheng Kueh ,&nbsp;YoungHo Kim ,&nbsp;Garry Kuan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajsep.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study is to examine the structural relationship in the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavioural change constructs among undergraduate students. A cross-sectional study was carried out by randomly selecting students participating in campus co-curricular activities. Questionnaires, comprising queries on the stages of change (SOC) — an 18-item self-efficacy (SE) scale, a 10-item decisional balance (DB) scale, and 30-item processes of change (PoC) scale — were distributed to the students. Their answers were analysed using Mplus 8 software for structural equation modelling. There were 562 participants comprising 118 males (21.0 %) and 444 females (79.0 %) with average age of 19.81±1.22 SD. Most of them were involved in sports (46.3 %) and non-sports (46.6 %) programmes, and exercised at least three times per week for approximately 43 minutes per session. Minority of the undergraduate students (7.1%) are involved in uniform group. The initial hypothesized structural equation modelling showed that the data fitted well. The fit indices were within recommended values (CFI= 0.967; TLI= 0.939; SRMR= 0.034; RMSEA (CI: 90%) = 0.049 (0.028, 0.070); RMSEA <em>p</em>= 0.495). There were three hypothesized path relationships in this model. From the final structural model, the SOC had significant direct effects on SE (<em>p</em> = 0.001), DB (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and PoC (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, the study showed a positive relationship between TTM constructs. It could act as an excellent baseline model for physical activity intervention or motivational intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100129,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667239121000241/pdfft?md5=97bccdcc6462855aedc8c2a659bb7def&pid=1-s2.0-S2667239121000241-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667239121000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the structural relationship in the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavioural change constructs among undergraduate students. A cross-sectional study was carried out by randomly selecting students participating in campus co-curricular activities. Questionnaires, comprising queries on the stages of change (SOC) — an 18-item self-efficacy (SE) scale, a 10-item decisional balance (DB) scale, and 30-item processes of change (PoC) scale — were distributed to the students. Their answers were analysed using Mplus 8 software for structural equation modelling. There were 562 participants comprising 118 males (21.0 %) and 444 females (79.0 %) with average age of 19.81±1.22 SD. Most of them were involved in sports (46.3 %) and non-sports (46.6 %) programmes, and exercised at least three times per week for approximately 43 minutes per session. Minority of the undergraduate students (7.1%) are involved in uniform group. The initial hypothesized structural equation modelling showed that the data fitted well. The fit indices were within recommended values (CFI= 0.967; TLI= 0.939; SRMR= 0.034; RMSEA (CI: 90%) = 0.049 (0.028, 0.070); RMSEA p= 0.495). There were three hypothesized path relationships in this model. From the final structural model, the SOC had significant direct effects on SE (p = 0.001), DB (p < 0.001) and PoC (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the study showed a positive relationship between TTM constructs. It could act as an excellent baseline model for physical activity intervention or motivational intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚大学校园学生行为改变建构的跨理论模型中的结构关系
本研究旨在探讨大学生行为改变构念的跨理论模型(TTM)中的结构关系。采用横断面研究方法,随机抽取参加校园课外活动的学生。问卷内容包括18项自我效能(SE)量表、10项决策平衡(DB)量表和30项变化过程(PoC)量表。他们的答案用Mplus 8结构方程建模软件进行分析。562人,男性118人(21.0%),女性444人(79.0%),平均年龄19.81±1.22 SD。他们中的大多数人参加体育(46.3%)和非体育(46.6%)项目,每周至少锻炼三次,每次锻炼约43分钟。少数本科生(7.1%)属于统一组。初始假设结构方程模型表明数据拟合良好。拟合指数均在推荐范围内(CFI= 0.967;TLI = 0.939;SRMR = 0.034;Rmsea (ci: 90%) = 0.049 (0.028, 0.070);RMSEA p= 0.495)。在这个模型中有三种假设的路径关系。从最终的结构模型来看,SOC对SE (p = 0.001)、DB (p <0.001)和PoC (p <0.001)。综上所述,本研究显示TTM构念之间存在正相关。它可以作为身体活动干预或动机干预的一个很好的基线模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing exercise and sport participation among adults living with spinal cord injuries in Japan Gaze behavior and decision-making in simulated defensive situations for baseball fielders using a head-mounted display An attempt to measure yips symptoms for athletes: Scale development and examination of reliability and validity Sleep, chronotype and health promoting behaviours as predictors of Taiwanese University students’ depressive symptoms The relationship between subjective sleep, mental health, and life skills acquisition among university student-athletes: A study on gender differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1