Models to evaluate service Provisioning over Cloud Computing Environments - A Blockchain-As-A-Service case study

Carlos Melo, J. Dantas, Ronierison Maciel, P. Silva, P. Maciel
{"title":"Models to evaluate service Provisioning over Cloud Computing Environments - A Blockchain-As-A-Service case study","authors":"Carlos Melo, J. Dantas, Ronierison Maciel, P. Silva, P. Maciel","doi":"10.22456/2175-2745.91814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ThestrictnessoftheServiceLevelAgreements(SLAs)ismainlyduetoasetofconstraintsrelated to performance and dependability attributes, such as availability. This paper shows that system’s availability values may be improved by deploying services over a private environment, which may obtain better availability values with improved management, security, and control. However, how much a company needs to afford to keep this improved availability? As an additional activity, this paper compares the obtained availability values with the infrastructure deployment expenses and establishes a cost  ×  benefit relationship. As for the system’s evaluation technique, we choose modeling; while for the service used to demonstrate the models’ feasibility, the blockchain-as-a-service was the selected one. This paper proposes and evaluate four different infrastructures hosting blockchains: (i) baseline; (ii) double redundant; (iii) triple redundant, and (iv) hyper-converged. The obtained results pointed out that the hyper-converged architecture had an advantage over a full triple redundant environment regarding availability and deployment cost.","PeriodicalId":82472,"journal":{"name":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","volume":"25 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.91814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ThestrictnessoftheServiceLevelAgreements(SLAs)ismainlyduetoasetofconstraintsrelated to performance and dependability attributes, such as availability. This paper shows that system’s availability values may be improved by deploying services over a private environment, which may obtain better availability values with improved management, security, and control. However, how much a company needs to afford to keep this improved availability? As an additional activity, this paper compares the obtained availability values with the infrastructure deployment expenses and establishes a cost  ×  benefit relationship. As for the system’s evaluation technique, we choose modeling; while for the service used to demonstrate the models’ feasibility, the blockchain-as-a-service was the selected one. This paper proposes and evaluate four different infrastructures hosting blockchains: (i) baseline; (ii) double redundant; (iii) triple redundant, and (iv) hyper-converged. The obtained results pointed out that the hyper-converged architecture had an advantage over a full triple redundant environment regarding availability and deployment cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估云计算环境下服务供应的模型——区块链即服务案例研究
服务级别协议(sla)的严格性主要是由于与性能和可靠性属性(如可用性)相关的约束的限制。本文表明,通过在私有环境上部署服务,可以提高系统的可用性值,通过改进管理、安全性和控制,可以获得更好的可用性值。然而,为了保持这种改进的可用性,公司需要支付多少费用?作为一项附加活动,本文将获得的可用性值与基础设施部署费用进行比较,并建立成本×效益关系。对于系统的评价技术,我们选择建模;而对于用于演示模型可行性的服务,则选择了区块链即服务。本文提出并评估了托管区块链的四种不同基础设施:(i)基线;(ii)双重冗余;(iii)三冗余和(iv)超融合。获得的结果指出,在可用性和部署成本方面,超融合架构比完全三冗余环境具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Causal Effect Estimation of Emotional Labeling of Watched Videos Exploring Supervised Techniques for Automated Recognition of Intention Classes from Portuguese Free Texts on Agriculture Stochastic Models for Planning VLE Moodle Environments based on Containers and Virtual Machines A Review of Testbeds on SCADA Systems with Malware Analysis A Conceptual Model for Situating Purposes in Artificial Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1