Revalidation and medico-legal practice after retirement

1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Pub Date : 2015-08-01 DOI:10.1302/2048-0105.44.360365
M. Foy
{"title":"Revalidation and medico-legal practice after retirement","authors":"M. Foy","doi":"10.1302/2048-0105.44.360365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, many consultant orthopaedic surgeons have retired from clinical practice and supplemented their pensions in retirement by continuing their medico-legal practice. The longevity of this custom has varied enormously from surgeon to surgeon. There has been no clear monitoring of the situation after retirement in terms of currency or quality of work, other than the fact that if solicitors/insurers continued to issue instructions to the individual then it was presumed that the quality and content of the reports and expert opinion provided were fit for purpose.\n\nThen along came revalidation in 2012. I discussed some of the prevalent issues on the subject in an article published in this journal a year ago.1 This brief article should be seen as an update and considered together with the earlier piece.\n\nIt has been difficult to get a clear position statement from the GMC on this matter, but my understanding remains that if an orthopaedic surgeon is interviewing and examining patients (claimants), he/she is required to maintain GMC registration and hold a licence to practice. In order to do this, the surgeon needs to undergo annual appraisal and revalidate every five years in exactly the same way as they would be required to do when in active (NHS or private) practice. The MDU2 appears quite clear on this, …","PeriodicalId":50250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"37-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2048-0105.44.360365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, many consultant orthopaedic surgeons have retired from clinical practice and supplemented their pensions in retirement by continuing their medico-legal practice. The longevity of this custom has varied enormously from surgeon to surgeon. There has been no clear monitoring of the situation after retirement in terms of currency or quality of work, other than the fact that if solicitors/insurers continued to issue instructions to the individual then it was presumed that the quality and content of the reports and expert opinion provided were fit for purpose. Then along came revalidation in 2012. I discussed some of the prevalent issues on the subject in an article published in this journal a year ago.1 This brief article should be seen as an update and considered together with the earlier piece. It has been difficult to get a clear position statement from the GMC on this matter, but my understanding remains that if an orthopaedic surgeon is interviewing and examining patients (claimants), he/she is required to maintain GMC registration and hold a licence to practice. In order to do this, the surgeon needs to undergo annual appraisal and revalidate every five years in exactly the same way as they would be required to do when in active (NHS or private) practice. The MDU2 appears quite clear on this, …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退休后的再认证和医疗法律实践
传统上,许多骨科顾问医生已经从临床实践中退休,并通过继续他们的医疗法律实践来补充他们的退休养老金。这一习俗的持续时间因外科医生而异。对于退休后的情况,除了律师/保险公司继续向个人发出指示外,并没有就薪酬或工作质素作出明确的监察,则可推定所提供的报告和专家意见的质素和内容符合目的。然后在2012年出现了重新验证。我在一年前发表在这个杂志上的一篇文章中讨论了一些关于这个主题的流行问题这篇简短的文章应该被视为一个更新,并与之前的文章一起考虑。在这个问题上很难从GMC得到明确的立场声明,但我的理解仍然是,如果矫形外科医生正在采访和检查患者(索赔人),他/她必须保持GMC注册并持有执业执照。为了做到这一点,外科医生需要进行年度评估,并每五年重新验证一次,就像他们在活跃的(NHS或私人)实践中所要求的那样。MDU2在这一点上表现得很清楚……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis, Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 2 Years Implant-Positioning and Patient Factors Associated with Acromial and Scapular Spine Fractures After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty In Older Patients with an Unreconstructible Distal Humeral Fracture, Elbow Hemiarthroplasty and Total Elbow Arthroplasty Did Not Differ for Function at ≥2 Years Newton C. McCollough III Robert G. (Bob) Volz 1932-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1