Adoption of competence management practices by industries in an emerging country: an analysis via fuzzy TOPSIS

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Personnel Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1108/pr-05-2023-0399
João Vyctor Brás dos Santos, T. Sigahi, I. Rampasso, G. Moraes, Lucas Veiga Ávila, W. Leal Filho, R. Anholon
{"title":"Adoption of competence management practices by industries in an emerging country: an analysis via fuzzy TOPSIS","authors":"João Vyctor Brás dos Santos, T. Sigahi, I. Rampasso, G. Moraes, Lucas Veiga Ávila, W. Leal Filho, R. Anholon","doi":"10.1108/pr-05-2023-0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine competence management practices in Brazilian industries using ISO 10015 as a framework of analysis, which establishes guidelines for competence management and people development.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted with 22 high-qualified human resources management (HRM) professionals (81.8% of participants hold a PhD) with extensive experience in the Brazilian industrial sector (an average of 20.4 years). The experts assessed 13 practices (P) elaborated based on the ISO 10015:2020, considering two categories: large industries (LI) and small and medium-sized industries (SMI). Data analysis was performed using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, frequency analysis, Fuzzy TOPSIS and sensitivity analysis.FindingsThe practice “individual competences are correctly defined by organizations at all hierarchical levels” was deemed the best practice for LIs, while the practice “clear definition of activities and their specificities when structuring competence management and people development programs” was considered the best practice for SMIs. The practice “organizations map employees' future competence and development needs on a regular basis” received the lowest rating for both LIs and SMIs. When compared to LIs, SMIs have more severe deficiencies in applying competence management practices. The study's findings can be of great value in assisting managers in implementing structured competence management systems and people development initiatives.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study can be used by managers of businesses of all sizes and economic sectors to analyze their critical points in order to identify opportunities to improve their competence management systems and people development programs.Originality/valueThis study fills a knowledge gap by analyzing the adoption of competence management practices in Brazil, answering the call for HRM research in developing countries. By using ISO 10015 as a framework of analysis, this study also addresses the literature gap regarding this important and relatively new management tool.","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-05-2023-0399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine competence management practices in Brazilian industries using ISO 10015 as a framework of analysis, which establishes guidelines for competence management and people development.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted with 22 high-qualified human resources management (HRM) professionals (81.8% of participants hold a PhD) with extensive experience in the Brazilian industrial sector (an average of 20.4 years). The experts assessed 13 practices (P) elaborated based on the ISO 10015:2020, considering two categories: large industries (LI) and small and medium-sized industries (SMI). Data analysis was performed using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, frequency analysis, Fuzzy TOPSIS and sensitivity analysis.FindingsThe practice “individual competences are correctly defined by organizations at all hierarchical levels” was deemed the best practice for LIs, while the practice “clear definition of activities and their specificities when structuring competence management and people development programs” was considered the best practice for SMIs. The practice “organizations map employees' future competence and development needs on a regular basis” received the lowest rating for both LIs and SMIs. When compared to LIs, SMIs have more severe deficiencies in applying competence management practices. The study's findings can be of great value in assisting managers in implementing structured competence management systems and people development initiatives.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study can be used by managers of businesses of all sizes and economic sectors to analyze their critical points in order to identify opportunities to improve their competence management systems and people development programs.Originality/valueThis study fills a knowledge gap by analyzing the adoption of competence management practices in Brazil, answering the call for HRM research in developing countries. By using ISO 10015 as a framework of analysis, this study also addresses the literature gap regarding this important and relatively new management tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个新兴国家各行业对能力管理实践的采用:基于模糊TOPSIS的分析
本文的目的是使用ISO 10015作为分析框架来检查巴西工业中的能力管理实践,该框架为能力管理和人员发展建立了指导方针。设计/方法/方法对22名在巴西工业部门拥有丰富经验(平均20.4年)的高素质人力资源管理(HRM)专业人士(81.8%的参与者拥有博士学位)进行了调查。专家们评估了基于ISO 10015:2020制定的13项实践(P),考虑了两类:大型工业(LI)和中小型工业(SMI)。数据分析采用层次聚类分析、频率分析、模糊TOPSIS和敏感性分析。研究发现:“所有层级的组织都正确定义个人能力”的实践被认为是中小企业的最佳实践,而“在构建能力管理和人员发展计划时明确定义活动及其特殊性”的实践被认为是中小企业的最佳实践。“组织定期绘制员工未来的能力和发展需求”的做法在i和smi中都得到了最低的评价。与中小企业相比,中小企业在运用胜任力管理实践方面存在更严重的不足。这项研究的结果在协助管理人员实施结构化的能力管理系统和人员发展倡议方面具有很大的价值。实际意义本研究的结果可以被各种规模和经济部门的企业管理者用来分析他们的关键点,以确定改善他们的能力管理系统和人员发展计划的机会。原创性/价值本研究通过分析巴西采用能力管理实践填补了知识空白,响应了发展中国家人力资源管理研究的呼吁。通过使用ISO 10015作为分析框架,本研究还解决了关于这一重要且相对较新的管理工具的文献差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Getting along and getting ahead: voice trails of status pursuit Exploring local job seekers perception toward employment in the private and public sectors in Qatar: implications for workforce nationalization policies Adoption of competence management practices by industries in an emerging country: an analysis via fuzzy TOPSIS Examining employee experiences of hybrid work: an ecological approach What is in your résumé? The effects of multiple social categories in résumé screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1