Geriatric Prescription in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital

Nwani Paul Osemeke, O. Hart, Nwosu Maduaburochukwu Cosmas, Isah Ambrose Ohumagho
{"title":"Geriatric Prescription in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Nwani Paul Osemeke, O. Hart, Nwosu Maduaburochukwu Cosmas, Isah Ambrose Ohumagho","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.195086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess the medications prescribed for elderly inpatients on specific days during hospital admission with a view to detecting areas of irrational prescription. Methods: It was a prospective study of all patients aged 65 years and above admitted to the medical wards of a Nigerian tertiary hospital over a 12-month period. The World Health Organization/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) drug use indicators were used to assess drug prescriptions on various days of admission. Results: A total of 1513 patient encounters involving 345 patients aged between 65 and 92 years were assessed on hospital days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28. The average number of medicines per encounter ranged from 6.1 ± 2.5 on hospital day 1 to 7.8 ± 2.4 on hospital day 28. This difference was statistically significant (F = 14.42; P < 0.05). The percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed ranged from 50.4% on hospital day 1 to 62.9% on hospital day 28 while the percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed decreased from 72.8% on hospital day 1 to 50.0% on day 28. Conclusions: This study suggests some degree of irrational prescribing as evident by the high average number of medicine per encounter and the high percentages of encounters with an antibiotic or injection prescribed. However, there is a need to develop standard values for the WHO/INRUD indicators based on the recently published national treatment guidelines for common elderly diseases which will serve as yardsticks to assess elderly inpatients prescriptions using WHO/INRUD core indicators in future studies.","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"43 1","pages":"20 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.195086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the medications prescribed for elderly inpatients on specific days during hospital admission with a view to detecting areas of irrational prescription. Methods: It was a prospective study of all patients aged 65 years and above admitted to the medical wards of a Nigerian tertiary hospital over a 12-month period. The World Health Organization/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) drug use indicators were used to assess drug prescriptions on various days of admission. Results: A total of 1513 patient encounters involving 345 patients aged between 65 and 92 years were assessed on hospital days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28. The average number of medicines per encounter ranged from 6.1 ± 2.5 on hospital day 1 to 7.8 ± 2.4 on hospital day 28. This difference was statistically significant (F = 14.42; P < 0.05). The percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed ranged from 50.4% on hospital day 1 to 62.9% on hospital day 28 while the percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed decreased from 72.8% on hospital day 1 to 50.0% on day 28. Conclusions: This study suggests some degree of irrational prescribing as evident by the high average number of medicine per encounter and the high percentages of encounters with an antibiotic or injection prescribed. However, there is a need to develop standard values for the WHO/INRUD indicators based on the recently published national treatment guidelines for common elderly diseases which will serve as yardsticks to assess elderly inpatients prescriptions using WHO/INRUD core indicators in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚一家三级医院的老年处方
目的:对老年住院患者住院期间特定天数的用药情况进行评估,发现处方不合理的地方。方法:对尼日利亚某三级医院住院12个月以上的65岁及以上患者进行前瞻性研究。使用世界卫生组织/国际合理用药网络(世卫组织/合理用药网)药物使用指标来评估入院各天的药物处方。结果:在住院第1、3、5、7、14和28天,共有1513例患者就诊,涉及345例年龄在65至92岁之间的患者。每次就诊的平均药物数量从住院第1天的6.1±2.5到住院第28天的7.8±2.4。差异有统计学意义(F = 14.42;P < 0.05)。使用抗生素的比例从第1天的50.4%到第28天的62.9%不等,而使用注射的比例从第1天的72.8%下降到第28天的50.0%。结论:这项研究表明一定程度的不合理的处方,从每次就诊的高平均药物数量和高比例的就诊抗生素或注射处方可见一斑。然而,有必要根据最近出版的国家老年常见病治疗指南,为卫生组织/INRUD指标制定标准值,作为今后研究中使用卫生组织/INRUD核心指标评估老年住院病人处方的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note on Flavonoids Evaluation of Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump for Oral Delivery of Ketorolac Prescribing Pattern and Potency of Anti-Diabetic Drugs in Diabetic Patients for Maintaining Optimal Glycemic Levels Community Pharmacy Practice Towards Cancer Health and the Need for Continuous Cancer Education: Ghana Situation Unusual Case of an Alcoholic with Liver Injury from Sulfasalazine Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1