Association between Obesity and Cancer: An Analysis Using the Competing Risk Regression Approach

M. Bimali, Jianghua He
{"title":"Association between Obesity and Cancer: An Analysis Using the Competing Risk Regression Approach","authors":"M. Bimali, Jianghua He","doi":"10.1155/2015/132961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cox model has been the commonly used method in past analyses of association between obesity and the risk estimates of cancer in situations where the subjects have also died (or could die) of noncancer events (competing events). The Cox model does not address the presence of competing events convincingly. The competing risk approach accommodates the fact that individuals who died of other causes (competing events) will never die of cancer and thus provides more realistic estimates. This study uses the competing risk approach to study the association of obesity and cancer mortality and compare the analysis results with those based on the traditional Cox model. It was seen that while the cause-specific hazard rate of cancer is significantly higher for obese population compared to normal weight population, the difference is not significant using competing risk approach. We demonstrated that higher cause-specific hazard rate does not necessarily imply higher incidence rate and in situations involving competing events we recommend using competing risk approach in addition to the Cox regression model.","PeriodicalId":91644,"journal":{"name":"Advances in epidemiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/132961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cox model has been the commonly used method in past analyses of association between obesity and the risk estimates of cancer in situations where the subjects have also died (or could die) of noncancer events (competing events). The Cox model does not address the presence of competing events convincingly. The competing risk approach accommodates the fact that individuals who died of other causes (competing events) will never die of cancer and thus provides more realistic estimates. This study uses the competing risk approach to study the association of obesity and cancer mortality and compare the analysis results with those based on the traditional Cox model. It was seen that while the cause-specific hazard rate of cancer is significantly higher for obese population compared to normal weight population, the difference is not significant using competing risk approach. We demonstrated that higher cause-specific hazard rate does not necessarily imply higher incidence rate and in situations involving competing events we recommend using competing risk approach in addition to the Cox regression model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖与癌症之间的关系:使用竞争风险回归方法的分析
Cox模型一直是过去分析肥胖与癌症风险评估之间关系的常用方法,在这种情况下,受试者也死于(或可能死于)非癌症事件(竞争事件)。考克斯模型没有令人信服地解决竞争事件的存在。竞争风险方法考虑到这样一个事实,即死于其他原因(竞争事件)的个体永远不会死于癌症,因此提供了更现实的估计。本研究采用竞争风险方法研究肥胖与癌症死亡率的关系,并与传统Cox模型的分析结果进行比较。研究发现,虽然肥胖人群的癌症原因特异性危险率明显高于正常体重人群,但使用竞争风险方法,差异不显著。我们证明了较高的原因特异性危险率并不一定意味着较高的发病率,在涉及竞争事件的情况下,我们建议在Cox回归模型之外使用竞争风险方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Perceived Built Environment and Prevalent Hypertension among South African Adults Smoking and Heberden Nodes: Analysis of Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative Measuring Entropy Change in a Human Physiological System Trajectories of Body Mass Index from Young Adulthood to Middle Age among Canadian Men and Women Survival of Preterm Singleton Deliveries: A Population-Based Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1