Disengagement in the Digital Age: A Virtue Ethical Approach to Epistemic Sorting on Social Media

IF 0.9 Q3 ETHICS Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2019-09-19 DOI:10.1515/mopp-2018-0066
K. Worden
{"title":"Disengagement in the Digital Age: A Virtue Ethical Approach to Epistemic Sorting on Social Media","authors":"K. Worden","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2018-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using the Aristotelian virtue of friendship and concept of practical wisdom, this paper argues that engaging in political discourse with friends on social media is conducive to the pursuit of the good life because it facilitates the acquisition of the socio-political information and understanding necessary to live well. Previous work on social media, the virtues, and friendship focuses on the initiation and maintenance of the highest form of friendship (Aristotle’s ‘ideal friendship’) online. I argue that the information necessary to live well can come from non-ideal, civic friends in addition to ideal friends. In order to acquire this information successfully via social media, users should practice inclusive engagement, self-control, discretion, and audience-sensitivity in their cyber interactions. This argument is salient given the current concerns about ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles’, in which users ignore or block out friends and news sources that support political perspectives different from one’s own.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"61 1","pages":"235 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2018-0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Using the Aristotelian virtue of friendship and concept of practical wisdom, this paper argues that engaging in political discourse with friends on social media is conducive to the pursuit of the good life because it facilitates the acquisition of the socio-political information and understanding necessary to live well. Previous work on social media, the virtues, and friendship focuses on the initiation and maintenance of the highest form of friendship (Aristotle’s ‘ideal friendship’) online. I argue that the information necessary to live well can come from non-ideal, civic friends in addition to ideal friends. In order to acquire this information successfully via social media, users should practice inclusive engagement, self-control, discretion, and audience-sensitivity in their cyber interactions. This argument is salient given the current concerns about ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles’, in which users ignore or block out friends and news sources that support political perspectives different from one’s own.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字时代的脱离:社交媒体认知分类的美德伦理方法
利用亚里士多德的友谊美德和实践智慧的概念,本文认为,与朋友在社交媒体上进行政治话语有助于追求美好生活,因为它有助于获取生活所需的社会政治信息和理解。之前关于社交媒体、美德和友谊的研究主要集中在网络上最高形式的友谊(亚里士多德的“理想友谊”)的建立和维持。我认为,生活所需的信息除了来自理想的朋友之外,还可以来自非理想的公民朋友。为了通过社交媒体成功获取这些信息,用户应该在网络互动中实践包容性参与、自我控制、谨慎和受众敏感性。考虑到当前对“回音室”或“过滤气泡”的担忧,这一论点显得尤为突出。在“回音室”或“过滤气泡”中,用户忽略或屏蔽支持与自己不同政治观点的朋友和新闻来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Moral Philosophy and Politics
Moral Philosophy and Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Why Military Conditioning Violates the Human Dignity of Soldiers Moral Reasoning in the Climate Crisis: A Personal Guide Applying Different Concepts and Conceptions of Legitimacy to the International Level: Service, Free Group Agents, and Autonomy Hybrid Ethical Theory and Cohen’s Critique of Rawls’s Egalitarian Liberalism Ideal Theory and Real Politics: The Politics in Political Liberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1